FAIRMol

ulfkktlib_2028

Pose ID 13710 Compound 5183 Pose 152

DB SELECTIONDocking pose analysis is being read from this database.
Molecular metrics status: done
RDKit SASA-based burial metrics are cached.
SASA cached
T21
T. cruzi R5P T. cruzi
Ligand ulfkktlib_2028
PDB3K7O

3D complex viewer

Strict H-bonds Permissive H-bonds
Viewer legend
Protein receptor
Pocket residues
Cofactor context
Docked ligand
Overall assessment
Weak SASA cached
Weak or marginal quality
Binding strong Geometry high Native strong SASA done
Strain ΔE
21.9 kcal/mol
Protein clashes
1
Internal clashes
1
Native overlap
contact recall 0.93, Jaccard 0.72, H-bond role recall 0.56
Burial
72%
Hydrophobic fit
67%
Reason: no major geometry red flags detected
1 protein-contact clashes 39% of hydrophobic surface appears solvent-exposed (9/23 atoms). Partial exposure is common but may limit selectivity and membrane permeability.
EcoTox / ADMET GDS: UNSAFE UL GreenDrugScore ML model
ECOscore
0.697
aquatic tox · BCF · biodeg.
GDS₃ (3-block)
0.501
ADMET + ECO + DL
ADMETscore (GDS)
0.482
absorption · distr. · metab.
DLscore
0.418
drug-likeness
P(SAFE)
0.10
GDS classification
ADMET alerts (in-silico)
hERG Medium Ames Clear DILI Low
Molecular report
Full metrics ↗
Weak Marginal quality. Consider only alongside better-scoring alternatives.
✓ Excellent LE (-0.805 kcal/mol/HA) ✓ Good fit quality (FQ -7.92) ✓ Good H-bonds (5 bonds) ✓ Deep burial (72% SASA buried) ✓ Lipophilic contacts well-matched (67%) ✗ High strain energy (21.9 kcal/mol) ✗ Geometry warnings ✗ Many internal clashes (21)
Score
-25.772
kcal/mol
LE
-0.805
kcal/mol/HA
Fit Quality
-7.92
FQ (Leeson)
HAC
32
heavy atoms
MW
432
Da
LogP
2.69
cLogP
Final rank
4.5128
rank score
Inter norm
-0.841
normalised
Contacts
17
H-bonds 14
Strain ΔE
21.9 kcal/mol
SASA buried
72%
Lipo contact
67% BSA apolar/total
SASA unbound
675 Ų
Apolar buried
329 Ų

Interaction summary

HBD 1 HBA 4 HY 3 PI 4 CLASH 1

HBD/HBA · H-bonds (geometric)

HBD = ligand donates H · HBA = ligand accepts H · ~ = weak (≥110°). Mode: permissive. Residues: 4.

PI · π–π interactions

Native π–π recall is disabled because no explicit native π–π reference was stored.

HY · Hydrophobic contacts

CLASH · Clashes

Native ligand reference

★ reference
Interaction fingerprint calculated directly from the uploaded native ligand without docking. Current H-bond mode: permissive.
Name3K7OContacts14
PoseOpen native poseHB0
IFP residues
ARG137 ARG141 ASN103 HIS102 HIS138 ASP10 CYS69 GLY70 GLY74 HIS11 ILE73 PRO12 SER71 TYR46
Current overlap13Native recall0.93
Jaccard0.72RMSD-
HB strict6Strict recall0.50
HB same residue+role5HB role recall0.56
HB same residue6HB residue recall0.75

Protein summary

305 residues
Protein targetT21Atoms4646
Residues305Chains2
Residue summaryARG:576; ILE:532; VAL:512; GLU:420; ALA:360; PHE:240; HIS:238; LYS:220; THR:210; LEU:190; PRO:168; TYR:168; GLY:154; SER:154; ASP:144; ASN:112

All stored poses for this docking hit

PoseFinal rankInter normScoreHBCTCT overlapCT recallHB role rec.RMSDExcluded
218 4.340319573317319 -1.07131 -40.5655 14 22 0 0.00 0.00 - no Open
152 4.512812911117598 -0.840762 -25.7719 14 17 13 0.93 0.56 - no Current

Molecular metrics

RDKit SASA burial, strain energy (MMFF94s), ligand efficiency and fit quality for this docking pose.
✓ Metrics available

Scoring & efficiency

Docking score -25.772kcal/mol
Ligand efficiency (LE) -0.8054kcal/mol/HA
Score / heavy atom count
Fit quality (FQ) -7.920
LE / (0.072 + 0.95/HAC) — Leeson & Springthorpe
Heavy atom count 32HA

Physicochemical properties

Molecular weight 432.4Da
Lipinski: ≤ 500 Da
LogP (cLogP) 2.69
Lipinski: ≤ 5
Rotatable bonds 5

Conformational strain (MMFF94s)

Strain energy (ΔE) 21.95kcal/mol
< 5 good · 5–10 marginal · > 10 problematic
Docked FF energy 98.01kcal/mol
Minimised FF energy 76.06kcal/mol

SASA & burial

✓ computed
SASA (unbound) 675.2Ų
Total solvent-accessible surface area of free ligand
BSA total 489.1Ų
Buried surface area upon binding
BSA apolar 328.8Ų
Hydrophobic contacts buried
BSA polar 160.3Ų
Polar contacts buried
Fraction buried 72.4%
> 60 % indicates good pocket engagement
Lipophilic contact ratio 67.2%
BSA apolar / BSA total — high = hydrophobic driver
Δ Non-polar SASA -2193.9Ų
SASA_nonpolar(complex) − SASA_nonpolar(receptor) − SASA_nonpolar(ligand free). Negative = non-polar surface buried upon binding. Requires full polarity-decomposed SASA computation.
Receptor non-polar SASA 2482.0Ų
Non-polar SASA of receptor alone (VdW proxy, nonpolar atoms only)
Complex non-polar SASA 762.4Ų
Non-polar SASA of full complex (VdW proxy, nonpolar atoms only)