FAIRMol

ulfkktlib_1642

Pose ID 13115 Compound 5264 Pose 236

DB SELECTIONDocking pose analysis is being read from this database.
Molecular metrics status: done
RDKit SASA-based burial metrics are cached.
SASA cached
T20
T. brucei TR (Z-site (fragment hotspot)) T. brucei Z-site (fragment hotspot)
Ligand ulfkktlib_1642
PDB9IFH

3D complex viewer

Strict H-bonds Permissive H-bonds
Viewer legend
Protein receptor
Pocket residues
Cofactor context
Docked ligand
Overall assessment
Weak SASA cached
Promising but geometrically suspicious
Binding strong Geometry low Native strong SASA done
Strain ΔE
14.0 kcal/mol
Protein clashes
0
Internal clashes
16
Native overlap
contact recall 0.88, Jaccard 0.58, H-bond role recall 0.00
Burial
55%
Hydrophobic fit
93%
Reason: 16 internal clashes
16 intramolecular clashes 63% of hydrophobic surface is solvent-exposed (17/27 atoms). Large non-polar area without protein contacts incurs a desolvation penalty and will reduce binding affinity. Consider truncating or replacing the exposed fragment.
EcoTox / ADMET GDS: UNSAFE UL GreenDrugScore ML model
ECOscore
0.282
aquatic tox · BCF · biodeg.
GDS₃ (3-block)
0.312
ADMET + ECO + DL
ADMETscore (GDS)
0.242
absorption · distr. · metab.
DLscore
0.453
drug-likeness
P(SAFE)
0.36
GDS classification
ADMET alerts (in-silico)
hERG Medium Ames Clear DILI Risk
Molecular report
Full metrics ↗
Weak Marginal quality. Consider only alongside better-scoring alternatives.
✓ Excellent LE (-0.629 kcal/mol/HA) ✓ Good fit quality (FQ -6.24) ✓ Good burial (55% SASA buried) ✓ Lipophilic contacts well-matched (93%) ✗ Moderate strain (14.0 kcal/mol) ✗ Geometry warnings ✗ Many internal clashes (16)
Score
-20.747
kcal/mol
LE
-0.629
kcal/mol/HA
Fit Quality
-6.24
FQ (Leeson)
HAC
33
heavy atoms
MW
441
Da
LogP
4.73
cLogP
Final rank
3.6283
rank score
Inter norm
-0.573
normalised
Contacts
11
H-bonds 2
Strain ΔE
14.0 kcal/mol
SASA buried
55%
Lipo contact
93% BSA apolar/total
SASA unbound
743 Ų
Apolar buried
377 Ų

Interaction summary

HBD 1 HBA 1 HY 4 PI 1 CLASH 0

HBD/HBA · H-bonds (geometric)

HBD = ligand donates H · HBA = ligand accepts H · ~ = weak (≥110°). Mode: strict. Residues: 2.

PI · π–π interactions

Native π–π recall is disabled because no explicit native π–π reference was stored.

HY · Hydrophobic contacts

CLASH · Clashes

No clash · clashes detected for this pose.

Native ligand reference

★ reference
Interaction fingerprint calculated directly from the uploaded native ligand without docking. Current H-bond mode: strict.
Name9IFHContacts8
PoseOpen native poseHB0
IFP residues
ASN402 GLU467 LEU399 PHE396 PRO398 SER394 SER470 THR397
Current overlap7Native recall0.88
Jaccard0.58RMSD-
HB strict0Strict recall0.00
HB same residue+role0HB role recall0.00
HB same residue0HB residue recall0.00

Protein summary

492 residues
Protein targetT20Atoms7539
Residues492Chains1
Residue summaryVAL:768; LYS:704; LEU:703; ILE:532; GLU:450; THR:434; ARG:408; PHE:400; ALA:390; ASN:350; PRO:350; GLY:336; SER:319; TYR:294; ASP:264; MET:221

Receptor context

1 kept / 0 excluded
Receptor context filtering: interactions and SASA are computed against protein atoms plus allowed cofactors/ions. Native ligand-like HETATM partners are excluded from scoring.
Kept context 1 Excluded HETATM 0
Kept cofactors / ions
A:FAD501

All stored poses for this docking hit

PoseFinal rankInter normScoreHBCTCT overlapCT recallHB role rec.RMSDExcluded
236 3.6282880288545414 -0.572528 -20.7465 2 11 7 0.88 0.00 - no Current
238 3.6378886776398107 -0.570852 -20.7074 2 11 7 0.88 0.00 - no Open

Molecular metrics

RDKit SASA burial, strain energy (MMFF94s), ligand efficiency and fit quality for this docking pose.
✓ Metrics available

Scoring & efficiency

Docking score -20.747kcal/mol
Ligand efficiency (LE) -0.6287kcal/mol/HA
Score / heavy atom count
Fit quality (FQ) -6.238
LE / (0.072 + 0.95/HAC) — Leeson & Springthorpe
Heavy atom count 33HA

Physicochemical properties

Molecular weight 440.6Da
Lipinski: ≤ 500 Da
LogP (cLogP) 4.73
Lipinski: ≤ 5
Rotatable bonds 5

Conformational strain (MMFF94s)

Strain energy (ΔE) 13.95kcal/mol
< 5 good · 5–10 marginal · > 10 problematic
Docked FF energy 11.11kcal/mol
Minimised FF energy -2.84kcal/mol

SASA & burial

✓ computed
SASA (unbound) 743.1Ų
Total solvent-accessible surface area of free ligand
BSA total 406.9Ų
Buried surface area upon binding
BSA apolar 377.0Ų
Hydrophobic contacts buried
BSA polar 29.9Ų
Polar contacts buried
Fraction buried 54.8%
> 60 % indicates good pocket engagement
Lipophilic contact ratio 92.7%
BSA apolar / BSA total — high = hydrophobic driver
Δ Non-polar SASA -3223.8Ų
SASA_nonpolar(complex) − SASA_nonpolar(receptor) − SASA_nonpolar(ligand free). Negative = non-polar surface buried upon binding. Requires full polarity-decomposed SASA computation.
Receptor non-polar SASA 4069.8Ų
Non-polar SASA of receptor alone (VdW proxy, nonpolar atoms only)
Complex non-polar SASA 1517.6Ų
Non-polar SASA of full complex (VdW proxy, nonpolar atoms only)