FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
2 compounds in matrix 9 best compound-target hits listed 9 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T04T06T08T09T11T14T16
Z27305363
[H]N(C(=O)CCc1nc(=O)c2ccccc2n1[H])[C@H](C)c1ccc(-n2ccnc2)cc1
0.852 0.849 2 0.85 0.85
Z27305363
[H]N(C(=O)CCc1nc2ccccc2c(=O)n1[H])[C@@H](C)c1ccc(-n2ccnc2)cc1
0.843 0.809 7 0.80 0.82 0.80 0.84 0.84 0.80 0.76

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
Z27305363
[H]N(C(=O)CCc1nc(=O)c2ccccc2n1[H])[C@H](C)c1ccc(-n2ccnc2)cc1
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.852 1.000 0.576 native_similarity final_rank_score -32.3829 -1.0586 20 2 Pose
Z27305363
[H]N(C(=O)CCc1nc(=O)c2ccccc2n1[H])[C@H](C)c1ccc(-n2ccnc2)cc1
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.847 1.000 0.564 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.9655 -0.932632 17 6 Pose
Z27305363
[H]N(C(=O)CCc1nc2ccccc2c(=O)n1[H])[C@@H](C)c1ccc(-n2ccnc2)cc1
T06
native IFP available
T06
selection_import_t06
0.843 1.000 0.551 native_similarity final_rank_score -18.4595 -0.893307 20 3 Pose
Z27305363
[H]N(C(=O)CCc1nc2ccccc2c(=O)n1[H])[C@@H](C)c1ccc(-n2ccnc2)cc1
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.841 1.000 0.547 native_similarity final_rank_score -30.7536 -1.13798 20 3 Pose
Z27305363
[H]N(C(=O)CCc1nc2ccccc2c(=O)n1[H])[C@@H](C)c1ccc(-n2ccnc2)cc1
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.823 1.000 0.495 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.8138 -0.933713 19 5 Pose
Z27305363
[H]N(C(=O)CCc1nc2ccccc2c(=O)n1[H])[C@@H](C)c1ccc(-n2ccnc2)cc1
T04
native IFP available
T04
selection_import_t04
0.802 1.000 0.434 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.4298 -0.989899 14 2 Pose
Z27305363
[H]N(C(=O)CCc1nc2ccccc2c(=O)n1[H])[C@@H](C)c1ccc(-n2ccnc2)cc1
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.802 1.000 0.433 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.4354 -0.947405 17 3 Pose
Z27305363
[H]N(C(=O)CCc1nc2ccccc2c(=O)n1[H])[C@@H](C)c1ccc(-n2ccnc2)cc1
T14
native IFP available
T14
selection_import_t14
0.797 1.000 0.419 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.0649 -0.78662 16 4 Pose
Z27305363
[H]N(C(=O)CCc1nc2ccccc2c(=O)n1[H])[C@@H](C)c1ccc(-n2ccnc2)cc1
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.758 1.000 0.308 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.9309 -0.789709 16 3 Pose