FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
11 compounds in matrix 13 best compound-target hits listed 6 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T11T15T16T19
OSA_Lib_11
[H][N+]1([C@]23CC[N@@+]([H])(CCc4ccccc4)[C@H]([C@@H](c4ccccc4)C2)[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CCCC1
0.866 0.866 1 0.87
OSA_Lib_119
[H]O/N=C1\C[C@]2([N+]3([H])CCCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccccc1)C2
0.848 0.815 2 0.85 0.78
OSA_Lib_11
[H][N@@+]1(CCc2ccccc2)CC[C@]2(N3CCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccccc1)C2
0.835 0.835 1 0.84
OSA_Lib_112
[H][N+]1([C@]23C[C@H](OC(=O)CN4CCCCC4)[C@H]([C@H](c4ccccc4)C2)[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CCCCC1
0.835 0.835 1 0.84
OSA_Lib_11
[H][N@+]1(CCc2ccccc2)CC[C@]2(N3CCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@H](c1ccccc1)C2
0.820 0.820 1 0.82
OSA_Lib_111
[H][N+]1(CC(=O)O[C@@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CCCCC1
0.816 0.816 1 0.82
OSA_Lib_118
[H]N1CC[C@]2([N+]([H])(C)C)C[C@H](c3ccc(Cl)cc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C2
0.803 0.803 1 0.80
OSA_Lib_118
[H][N+]1([H])CC[C@]2([N+]([H])(C)C)C[C@H](c3ccc(Cl)cc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C2
0.786 0.781 2 0.78 0.79
OSA_Lib_112
[H][N+]1([C@]23C[C@H](OC(=O)CN4CCCCC4)[C@H]([C@@H](c4ccccc4)C2)[C@@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CCCCC1
0.773 0.773 1 0.77
OSA_Lib_11
[H][N@@+]1(CCc2ccccc2)CC[C@@]2(N3CCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@@H]1[C@H](c1ccccc1)C2
0.762 0.762 1 0.76
OSA_Lib_119
[H]O/N=C1\C[C@]2(N3CCCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccccc1)C2
0.724 0.724 1 0.72

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OSA_Lib_11
[H][N+]1([C@]23CC[N@@+]([H])(CCc4ccccc4)[C@H]([C@@H](c4ccccc4)C2)[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CCCC1
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.866 1.000 0.617 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.6287 -0.805609 20 0 Pose
OSA_Lib_119
[H]O/N=C1\C[C@]2([N+]3([H])CCCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccccc1)C2
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.848 1.000 0.567 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.0674 -0.942832 17 3 Pose
OSA_Lib_11
[H][N@@+]1(CCc2ccccc2)CC[C@]2(N3CCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccccc1)C2
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.835 1.000 0.530 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.1977 -0.705723 18 1 Pose
OSA_Lib_112
[H][N+]1([C@]23C[C@H](OC(=O)CN4CCCCC4)[C@H]([C@H](c4ccccc4)C2)[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CCCCC1
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.835 1.000 0.530 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.6237 -0.655169 18 1 Pose
OSA_Lib_11
[H][N@+]1(CCc2ccccc2)CC[C@]2(N3CCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@H](c1ccccc1)C2
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.820 1.000 0.485 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.7765 -0.771651 20 0 Pose
OSA_Lib_111
[H][N+]1(CC(=O)O[C@@H]2C[C@]3([N+]4([H])CCCCC4)C[C@@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H]2[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CCCCC1
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.816 1.000 0.475 native_similarity final_rank_score -14.0568 -0.765375 21 1 Pose
OSA_Lib_118
[H]N1CC[C@]2([N+]([H])(C)C)C[C@H](c3ccc(Cl)cc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C2
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.803 1.000 0.437 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.6758 -0.933898 14 2 Pose
OSA_Lib_118
[H][N+]1([H])CC[C@]2([N+]([H])(C)C)C[C@H](c3ccc(Cl)cc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C2
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.786 1.000 0.388 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.2489 -0.926927 13 2 Pose
OSA_Lib_119
[H]O/N=C1\C[C@]2([N+]3([H])CCCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccccc1)C2
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.782 1.000 0.378 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.1571 -0.825721 14 4 Pose
OSA_Lib_118
[H][N+]1([H])CC[C@]2([N+]([H])(C)C)C[C@H](c3ccc(Cl)cc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C2
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.777 1.000 0.362 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.471 -0.952671 13 2 Pose
OSA_Lib_112
[H][N+]1([C@]23C[C@H](OC(=O)CN4CCCCC4)[C@H]([C@@H](c4ccccc4)C2)[C@@H](c2ccccc2)C3)CCCCC1
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.773 1.000 0.352 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.6005 -0.664231 17 2 Pose
OSA_Lib_11
[H][N@@+]1(CCc2ccccc2)CC[C@@]2(N3CCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@@H]1[C@H](c1ccccc1)C2
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.762 1.000 0.321 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.2196 -0.712543 18 0 Pose
OSA_Lib_119
[H]O/N=C1\C[C@]2(N3CCCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccccc1)C2
T19
native IFP available
T19
selection_import_t19
0.724 1.000 0.211 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.0468 -1.19523 21 2 Pose