FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
5 compounds in matrix 8 best compound-target hits listed 7 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T03T04T06T07T08T19
OHD_TC1_71
[H]N(Cc1ccccc1)c1nc(N([H])c2ccccc2)[n+]([H])c2ccccc12
0.896 0.856 2 0.82 0.90
OHD_TC1_7
[H]N(C(=O)[C@H](Cc1ccccc1)N([H])C(=O)OCc1ccccc1)[C@H](/C=C/c1cccc[n+]1[H])Cc1ccccc1
0.871 0.871 1 0.87
OHD_TC1_71
[H]N(Cc1ccccc1)c1nc(N([H])c2ccccc2)nc2ccccc12
0.838 0.838 1 0.84
OHD_TC1_72
[H][N+]1([H])CCC(C[N+]([H])([H])Cc2ccc(-c3ccc(Br)cc3Cl)o2)CC1
0.837 0.830 3 0.84 0.83 0.83
OHD_TC1_70
[H]N(Cn1c(/C=C/c2cccc(C(F)(F)F)c2)nc2ccccc21)c1cccnc1
0.742 0.742 1 0.74

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OHD_TC1_71
[H]N(Cc1ccccc1)c1nc(N([H])c2ccccc2)[n+]([H])c2ccccc12
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.896 1.000 0.703 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.1849 -1.26924 17 4 Pose
OHD_TC1_7
[H]N(C(=O)[C@H](Cc1ccccc1)N([H])C(=O)OCc1ccccc1)[C@H](/C=C/c1cccc[n+]1[H])Cc1ccccc1
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.871 1.000 0.630 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.2203 -0.753944 22 2 Pose
OHD_TC1_71
[H]N(Cc1ccccc1)c1nc(N([H])c2ccccc2)nc2ccccc12
T07
native IFP available
T07
selection_import_t07
0.838 1.000 0.538 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.1043 -1.27087 16 3 Pose
OHD_TC1_72
[H][N+]1([H])CCC(C[N+]([H])([H])Cc2ccc(-c3ccc(Br)cc3Cl)o2)CC1
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.837 1.000 0.533 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.3274 -1.20227 16 3 Pose
OHD_TC1_72
[H][N+]1([H])CCC(C[N+]([H])([H])Cc2ccc(-c3ccc(Br)cc3Cl)o2)CC1
T06
native IFP available
T06
selection_import_t06
0.827 1.000 0.507 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.4261 -1.09744 18 0 Pose
OHD_TC1_72
[H][N+]1([H])CCC(C[N+]([H])([H])Cc2ccc(-c3ccc(Br)cc3Cl)o2)CC1
T04
native IFP available
T04
selection_import_t04
0.826 1.000 0.502 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.5043 -1.08994 12 2 Pose
OHD_TC1_71
[H]N(Cc1ccccc1)c1nc(N([H])c2ccccc2)[n+]([H])c2ccccc12
T06
native IFP available
T06
selection_import_t06
0.816 1.000 0.475 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.636 -0.911141 17 1 Pose
OHD_TC1_70
[H]N(Cn1c(/C=C/c2cccc(C(F)(F)F)c2)nc2ccccc21)c1cccnc1
T19
native IFP available
T19
selection_import_t19
0.742 1.000 0.262 native_similarity final_rank_score -32.9896 -1.09065 19 4 Pose