FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
1 compounds in matrix 8 best compound-target hits listed 8 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T05T15T17T18T20T21
KB_Leish_33
[H]N(c1cccc(C#N)c1)c1nccc(N2CCC(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c3cccc(C#N)c3)CC2)n1
0.895 0.831 8 0.87 0.87 0.86 0.80 0.77 0.81 0.78 0.89

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
KB_Leish_33
[H]N(c1cccc(C#N)c1)c1nccc(N2CCC(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c3cccc(C#N)c3)CC2)n1
T21
native IFP available
T21
selection_import_t21
0.895 1.000 0.700 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.7709 -0.858805 20 12 Pose
KB_Leish_33
[H]N(c1cccc(C#N)c1)c1nccc(N2CCC(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c3cccc(C#N)c3)CC2)n1
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.869 1.000 0.627 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.1995 -0.846275 17 3 Pose
KB_Leish_33
[H]N(c1cccc(C#N)c1)c1nccc(N2CCC(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c3cccc(C#N)c3)CC2)n1
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.869 1.000 0.627 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.3916 -0.993841 17 2 Pose
KB_Leish_33
[H]N(c1cccc(C#N)c1)c1nccc(N2CCC(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c3cccc(C#N)c3)CC2)n1
T05
native IFP available
T05
selection_import_t05
0.863 1.000 0.610 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.6464 -0.858335 15 6 Pose
KB_Leish_33
[H]N(c1cccc(C#N)c1)c1nccc(N2CCC(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c3cccc(C#N)c3)CC2)n1
T18
native IFP available
T18
selection_import_t18
0.809 1.000 0.453 native_similarity final_rank_score -17.4509 -0.703753 15 7 Pose
KB_Leish_33
[H]N(c1cccc(C#N)c1)c1nccc(N2CCC(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c3cccc(C#N)c3)CC2)n1
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.797 1.000 0.419 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.0966 -0.788301 13 5 Pose
KB_Leish_33
[H]N(c1cccc(C#N)c1)c1nccc(N2CCC(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c3cccc(C#N)c3)CC2)n1
T20
native IFP available
T20
selection_import_t20
0.779 1.000 0.369 native_similarity final_rank_score -18.7207 -0.584234 8 5 Pose
KB_Leish_33
[H]N(c1cccc(C#N)c1)c1nccc(N2CCC(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c3cccc(C#N)c3)CC2)n1
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.769 1.000 0.339 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.8296 -0.837547 19 6 Pose