FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
2 compounds in matrix 8 best compound-target hits listed 8 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T03T05T09T12T15T18T19T22
Z31545384
[H]N(C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H](CCSC)NS(=O)(=O)c1ccccc1F
0.901 0.843 5 0.87 0.90 0.77 0.81 0.86
Z31545384
[H]N(/N=C(\O)[C@H](CCSC)N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccccc1F)C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1
0.852 0.796 3 0.85 0.80 0.74

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
Z31545384
[H]N(C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H](CCSC)NS(=O)(=O)c1ccccc1F
T12
native IFP available
T12
selection_import_t12
0.901 1.000 0.717 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.3322 -0.90885 17 13 Pose
Z31545384
[H]N(C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H](CCSC)NS(=O)(=O)c1ccccc1F
T05
native IFP available
T05
selection_import_t05
0.869 1.000 0.624 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.5015 -0.916067 14 10 Pose
Z31545384
[H]N(C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H](CCSC)NS(=O)(=O)c1ccccc1F
T22
native IFP available
T22
selection_import_t22
0.858 1.000 0.594 native_similarity final_rank_score -29.952 -1.05754 23 10 Pose
Z31545384
[H]N(/N=C(\O)[C@H](CCSC)N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccccc1F)C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.852 1.000 0.578 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.2845 -0.87813 19 6 Pose
Z31545384
[H]N(C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H](CCSC)NS(=O)(=O)c1ccccc1F
T18
native IFP available
T18
selection_import_t18
0.813 1.000 0.466 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.6325 -0.627912 14 5 Pose
Z31545384
[H]N(/N=C(\O)[C@H](CCSC)N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccccc1F)C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.797 1.000 0.421 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.6714 -0.830865 15 4 Pose
Z31545384
[H]N(C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H](CCSC)NS(=O)(=O)c1ccccc1F
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.774 1.000 0.353 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.6443 -0.733583 14 7 Pose
Z31545384
[H]N(/N=C(\O)[C@H](CCSC)N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccccc1F)C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1
T19
native IFP available
T19
selection_import_t19
0.737 1.000 0.249 native_similarity final_rank_score -36.3498 -0.974716 22 7 Pose