FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
4 compounds in matrix 6 best compound-target hits listed 6 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T03T05T11T15T20
Z29582968
[H]N(C(=O)[C@@H]1CC(=O)N(c2ccc3c(c2)OCCO3)C1)[C@H](Cc1ccccc1)c1nc2ccccc2n1[H]
0.953 0.861 3 0.84 0.79 0.95
Z29582968
[H]N(C(=O)[C@H]1CC(=O)N(c2ccc3c(c2)OCCO3)C1)[C@@H](Cc1ccccc1)c1nc2ccccc2n1[H]
0.901 0.901 1 0.90
Z29582968
[H]N(C(=O)[C@H]1CC(=O)N(c2ccc3c(c2)OCCO3)C1)[C@H](Cc1ccccc1)c1nc2ccccc2n1[H]
0.855 0.855 1 0.86
Z29582968
[H]N(C(=O)[C@@H]1CC(=O)N(c2ccc3c(c2)OCCO3)C1)[C@@H](Cc1ccccc1)c1nc2ccccc2n1[H]
0.815 0.815 1 0.82

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
Z29582968
[H]N(C(=O)[C@@H]1CC(=O)N(c2ccc3c(c2)OCCO3)C1)[C@H](Cc1ccccc1)c1nc2ccccc2n1[H]
T20
native IFP available
T20
selection_import_t20
0.953 1.000 0.867 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.3694 -0.594465 12 5 Pose
Z29582968
[H]N(C(=O)[C@H]1CC(=O)N(c2ccc3c(c2)OCCO3)C1)[C@@H](Cc1ccccc1)c1nc2ccccc2n1[H]
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.901 1.000 0.717 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.3729 -0.706864 18 6 Pose
Z29582968
[H]N(C(=O)[C@H]1CC(=O)N(c2ccc3c(c2)OCCO3)C1)[C@H](Cc1ccccc1)c1nc2ccccc2n1[H]
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.855 1.000 0.586 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.243 -0.723454 20 1 Pose
Z29582968
[H]N(C(=O)[C@@H]1CC(=O)N(c2ccc3c(c2)OCCO3)C1)[C@H](Cc1ccccc1)c1nc2ccccc2n1[H]
T05
native IFP available
T05
selection_import_t05
0.838 1.000 0.536 native_similarity final_rank_score -31.709 -0.850101 13 6 Pose
Z29582968
[H]N(C(=O)[C@@H]1CC(=O)N(c2ccc3c(c2)OCCO3)C1)[C@@H](Cc1ccccc1)c1nc2ccccc2n1[H]
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.815 1.000 0.472 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.5857 -0.796022 17 3 Pose
Z29582968
[H]N(C(=O)[C@@H]1CC(=O)N(c2ccc3c(c2)OCCO3)C1)[C@H](Cc1ccccc1)c1nc2ccccc2n1[H]
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.792 1.000 0.405 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.8263 -0.733856 20 2 Pose