FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
1 compounds in matrix 10 best compound-target hits listed 10 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T04T05T07T10T12T13T14T19T20T21
Z19651549
[H]Oc1ccc(C(=O)CSc2nc3ccccc3o2)cc1O[H]
0.930 0.843 10 0.82 0.83 0.86 0.93 0.90 0.87 0.79 0.72 0.79 0.93

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
Z19651549
[H]Oc1ccc(C(=O)CSc2nc3ccccc3o2)cc1O[H]
T10
native IFP available
T10
selection_import_t10
0.930 1.000 0.801 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.6005 -1.50159 18 12 Pose
Z19651549
[H]Oc1ccc(C(=O)CSc2nc3ccccc3o2)cc1O[H]
T21
native IFP available
T21
selection_import_t21
0.927 1.000 0.793 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.6881 -1.34595 16 11 Pose
Z19651549
[H]Oc1ccc(C(=O)CSc2nc3ccccc3o2)cc1O[H]
T12
native IFP available
T12
selection_import_t12
0.896 1.000 0.704 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.737 -1.4057 16 10 Pose
Z19651549
[H]Oc1ccc(C(=O)CSc2nc3ccccc3o2)cc1O[H]
T13
native IFP available
T13
selection_import_t13
0.867 1.000 0.620 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.5647 -1.40164 21 7 Pose
Z19651549
[H]Oc1ccc(C(=O)CSc2nc3ccccc3o2)cc1O[H]
T07
native IFP available
T07
selection_import_t07
0.860 1.000 0.599 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.6964 -1.50673 13 8 Pose
Z19651549
[H]Oc1ccc(C(=O)CSc2nc3ccccc3o2)cc1O[H]
T05
native IFP available
T05
selection_import_t05
0.829 1.000 0.510 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.4286 -1.35939 16 11 Pose
Z19651549
[H]Oc1ccc(C(=O)CSc2nc3ccccc3o2)cc1O[H]
T04
native IFP available
T04
selection_import_t04
0.825 1.000 0.499 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.3355 -1.29964 13 2 Pose
Z19651549
[H]Oc1ccc(C(=O)CSc2nc3ccccc3o2)cc1O[H]
T14
native IFP available
T14
selection_import_t14
0.789 1.000 0.398 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.2029 -1.20429 11 6 Pose
Z19651549
[H]Oc1ccc(C(=O)CSc2nc3ccccc3o2)cc1O[H]
T20
native IFP available
T20
selection_import_t20
0.786 1.000 0.388 native_similarity final_rank_score -16.1192 -0.895968 7 6 Pose
Z19651549
[H]Oc1ccc(C(=O)CSc2nc3ccccc3o2)cc1O[H]
T19
native IFP available
T19
selection_import_t19
0.718 1.000 0.195 native_similarity final_rank_score -31.1493 -1.54392 17 11 Pose