FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
3 compounds in matrix 16 best compound-target hits listed 16 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T03T04T07T08T09T10T11T12T14T17T18T20T21T22
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)C[N@+]([H])(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
0.923 0.851 3 0.82 0.81 0.92
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CN(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
0.898 0.848 8 0.88 0.84 0.87 0.88 0.77 0.83 0.80 0.90
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)C[N@@+]([H])(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
0.895 0.844 5 0.87 0.89 0.86 0.82 0.78

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)C[N@+]([H])(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
T21
native IFP available
T21
selection_import_t21
0.923 1.000 0.780 native_similarity final_rank_score -29.5472 -0.724881 16 15 Pose
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CN(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
T22
native IFP available
T22
selection_import_t22
0.898 1.000 0.709 native_similarity final_rank_score -30.6767 -0.917323 24 12 Pose
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)C[N@@+]([H])(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
T10
native IFP available
T10
selection_import_t10
0.895 1.000 0.699 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.4973 -0.719835 17 9 Pose
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CN(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.884 1.000 0.668 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.2026 -0.84556 16 7 Pose
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CN(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.879 1.000 0.655 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.0589 -0.706716 21 7 Pose
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CN(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
T07
native IFP available
T07
selection_import_t07
0.868 1.000 0.622 native_similarity final_rank_score -32.7614 -0.920315 16 6 Pose
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)C[N@@+]([H])(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.866 1.000 0.617 native_similarity final_rank_score -30.5333 -0.731569 21 4 Pose
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)C[N@@+]([H])(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.858 1.000 0.595 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.3068 -0.659216 20 6 Pose
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CN(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
T04
native IFP available
T04
selection_import_t04
0.842 1.000 0.549 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.6212 -0.702237 13 4 Pose
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CN(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
T12
native IFP available
T12
selection_import_t12
0.835 1.000 0.528 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.0458 -0.714249 14 8 Pose
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)C[N@@+]([H])(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
T14
native IFP available
T14
selection_import_t14
0.820 1.000 0.487 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.0004 -0.617978 19 8 Pose
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)C[N@+]([H])(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.820 1.000 0.485 native_similarity final_rank_score -30.4751 -0.767107 20 5 Pose
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)C[N@+]([H])(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
T18
native IFP available
T18
selection_import_t18
0.809 1.000 0.453 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.5177 -0.602005 15 6 Pose
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CN(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
T20
native IFP available
T20
selection_import_t20
0.803 1.000 0.438 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.8728 -0.511351 15 6 Pose
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)C[N@@+]([H])(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.781 1.000 0.375 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.3895 -0.609457 21 7 Pose
TC489
[H]Oc1cc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CN(Cc4ccc(OC)cc4)c4c(C)cc(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc(O[H])c1
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.771 1.000 0.347 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.2718 -0.68483 15 8 Pose