FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
2 compounds in matrix 22 best compound-target hits listed 18 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T03T06T07T08T09T10T11T12T13T14T15T16T17T18T20T21
TC487
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
0.949 0.835 10 0.88 0.88 0.84 0.77 0.95 0.86 0.91 0.77 0.73 0.77
TC369
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
0.940 0.836 12 0.92 0.86 0.72 0.80 0.79 0.94 0.85 0.77 0.91 0.79 0.79 0.89

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
TC487
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T10
native IFP available
T10
selection_import_t10
0.949 1.000 0.855 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.2548 -0.994655 17 10 Pose
TC369
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T10
native IFP available
T10
selection_import_t10
0.940 1.000 0.827 native_similarity final_rank_score -29.1927 -1.04114 17 13 Pose
TC369
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.923 1.000 0.780 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.8791 -0.934578 18 6 Pose
TC369
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.912 1.000 0.750 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.9233 -0.782747 18 7 Pose
TC487
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T12
native IFP available
T12
selection_import_t12
0.907 1.000 0.735 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.624 -1.01708 21 12 Pose
TC369
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T21
native IFP available
T21
selection_import_t21
0.894 1.000 0.696 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.0434 -0.932927 17 12 Pose
TC487
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T07
native IFP available
T07
selection_import_t07
0.877 1.000 0.649 native_similarity final_rank_score -34.8174 -1.25321 16 5 Pose
TC487
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.876 1.000 0.644 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.6384 -0.894167 19 6 Pose
TC369
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.859 1.000 0.599 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.0929 -0.908661 19 6 Pose
TC487
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.859 1.000 0.597 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.9792 -0.951242 12 5 Pose
TC369
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T13
native IFP available
T13
selection_import_t13
0.854 1.000 0.583 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.4165 -1.00816 19 10 Pose
TC487
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.842 1.000 0.548 native_similarity final_rank_score -29.9104 -1.11776 16 4 Pose
TC369
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T06
native IFP available
T06
selection_import_t06
0.795 1.000 0.415 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.4826 -0.771977 19 3 Pose
TC369
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T18
native IFP available
T18
selection_import_t18
0.789 1.000 0.397 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.269 -0.752579 15 5 Pose
TC369
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T20
native IFP available
T20
selection_import_t20
0.789 1.000 0.396 native_similarity final_rank_score -14.6997 -0.64787 12 5 Pose
TC369
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.785 1.000 0.386 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.9209 -0.975088 18 4 Pose
TC487
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.775 1.000 0.356 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.4804 -1.03605 17 4 Pose
TC369
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T14
native IFP available
T14
selection_import_t14
0.774 1.000 0.354 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.6215 -0.887126 12 10 Pose
TC487
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.771 1.000 0.345 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.9905 -0.816328 18 6 Pose
TC487
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.768 1.000 0.337 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.2445 -0.791058 10 7 Pose
TC487
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.729 1.000 0.225 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.5454 -0.771486 13 6 Pose
TC369
[H]Oc1ccc(CCn2cc([C@@]3(C)CSc4c(C)c(O[H])c(C)c(C)c4O3)nn2)cc1O[H]
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.717 1.000 0.190 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.4869 -0.986427 10 6 Pose