FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
4 compounds in matrix 7 best compound-target hits listed 7 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T08T09T11T16T17
OSA_Lib_304
[H][N+]1([H])C[C@@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@@](N(C)Cc3ccccn3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
0.920 0.891 3 0.87 0.88 0.92
OSA_Lib_304
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccccn3)(C[C@@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
0.816 0.816 1 0.82
OSA_Lib_304
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccccn3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
0.805 0.777 2 0.80 0.75
OSA_Lib_304
[H][N+]1([H])C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@](N(C)Cc3ccccn3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
0.760 0.760 1 0.76

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OSA_Lib_304
[H][N+]1([H])C[C@@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@@](N(C)Cc3ccccn3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.920 1.000 0.772 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.3285 -0.752119 16 2 Pose
OSA_Lib_304
[H][N+]1([H])C[C@@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@@](N(C)Cc3ccccn3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.882 1.000 0.662 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.1928 -0.918668 21 1 Pose
OSA_Lib_304
[H][N+]1([H])C[C@@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@@](N(C)Cc3ccccn3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.871 1.000 0.630 native_similarity final_rank_score -18.8402 -0.903383 20 1 Pose
OSA_Lib_304
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccccn3)(C[C@@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.816 1.000 0.475 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.8771 -0.878783 17 1 Pose
OSA_Lib_304
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccccn3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.805 1.000 0.442 native_similarity final_rank_score -31.9513 -1.09423 16 1 Pose
OSA_Lib_304
[H][N+]1([H])C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@](N(C)Cc3ccccn3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.760 1.000 0.315 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.1443 -0.902055 15 4 Pose
OSA_Lib_304
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccccn3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.749 1.000 0.283 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.1886 -0.820765 18 3 Pose