FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
5 compounds in matrix 9 best compound-target hits listed 6 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T03T15T16T17T19T22
OSA_Lib_14
[H][N@+]1(CCc2ccccc2)CC[C@]2(N3CCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccc(Cl)cc3)[C@H]1[C@H](c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C2
0.831 0.810 3 0.81 0.83 0.79
OSA_Lib_142
[H][N+]1(C)CCN(CCN2C[C@H]3[C@H](c4ccccc4)C[C@]([N+]([H])(C)C)(C[C@H]3c3ccccc3)C2)CC1
0.820 0.820 1 0.82
OSA_Lib_14
[H][N+]1([C@@]23CC[N@@+]([H])(CCc4ccccc4)[C@@H]([C@@H](c4ccc(Cl)cc4)C2)[C@H](c2ccc(Cl)cc2)C3)CCCC1
0.813 0.800 2 0.79 0.81
OSA_Lib_148
[H]N1C(=O)C[C@]2([N+]3([H])CCCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccc(Cl)cc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C2
0.799 0.794 2 0.79 0.80
OSA_Lib_147
[H]O/N=C1\C[C@]2([N+]3([H])CCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccccc1)C2
0.724 0.724 1 0.72

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OSA_Lib_14
[H][N@+]1(CCc2ccccc2)CC[C@]2(N3CCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccc(Cl)cc3)[C@H]1[C@H](c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C2
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.831 1.000 0.517 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.8517 -0.659569 19 0 Pose
OSA_Lib_142
[H][N+]1(C)CCN(CCN2C[C@H]3[C@H](c4ccccc4)C[C@]([N+]([H])(C)C)(C[C@H]3c3ccccc3)C2)CC1
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.820 1.000 0.486 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.5794 -0.803975 18 1 Pose
OSA_Lib_14
[H][N+]1([C@@]23CC[N@@+]([H])(CCc4ccccc4)[C@@H]([C@@H](c4ccc(Cl)cc4)C2)[C@H](c2ccc(Cl)cc2)C3)CCCC1
T22
native IFP available
T22
selection_import_t22
0.813 1.000 0.466 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.5379 -0.846304 23 1 Pose
OSA_Lib_14
[H][N@+]1(CCc2ccccc2)CC[C@]2(N3CCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccc(Cl)cc3)[C@H]1[C@H](c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C2
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.813 1.000 0.465 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.4626 -0.751453 16 1 Pose
OSA_Lib_148
[H]N1C(=O)C[C@]2([N+]3([H])CCCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccc(Cl)cc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C2
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.799 1.000 0.425 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.2008 -0.878632 15 2 Pose
OSA_Lib_148
[H]N1C(=O)C[C@]2([N+]3([H])CCCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccc(Cl)cc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C2
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.789 1.000 0.397 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.582 -0.919738 15 2 Pose
OSA_Lib_14
[H][N@+]1(CCc2ccccc2)CC[C@]2(N3CCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccc(Cl)cc3)[C@H]1[C@H](c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C2
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.786 1.000 0.389 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.6522 -0.624433 19 0 Pose
OSA_Lib_14
[H][N+]1([C@@]23CC[N@@+]([H])(CCc4ccccc4)[C@@H]([C@@H](c4ccc(Cl)cc4)C2)[C@H](c2ccc(Cl)cc2)C3)CCCC1
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.786 1.000 0.388 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.4792 -0.666675 13 1 Pose
OSA_Lib_147
[H]O/N=C1\C[C@]2([N+]3([H])CCCC3)C[C@H](c3ccccc3)[C@H]1[C@@H](c1ccccc1)C2
T19
native IFP available
T19
selection_import_t19
0.724 1.000 0.213 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.2582 -1.2024 20 2 Pose