FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
1 compounds in matrix 8 best compound-target hits listed 8 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T07T08T10T11T14T17T19T21
OHD_TbNat_65
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=C/C(=O)O[C@H](Cc2ccc(O[H])c(O[H])c2)C(=O)O)cc1O[H]
0.915 0.852 8 0.86 0.83 0.90 0.86 0.80 0.88 0.76 0.92

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OHD_TbNat_65
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=C/C(=O)O[C@H](Cc2ccc(O[H])c(O[H])c2)C(=O)O)cc1O[H]
T21
native IFP available
T21
selection_import_t21
0.915 1.000 0.758 native_similarity final_rank_score -16.3801 -0.940251 16 15 Pose
OHD_TbNat_65
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=C/C(=O)O[C@H](Cc2ccc(O[H])c(O[H])c2)C(=O)O)cc1O[H]
T10
native IFP available
T10
selection_import_t10
0.899 1.000 0.713 native_similarity final_rank_score -15.5397 -0.998616 15 12 Pose
OHD_TbNat_65
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=C/C(=O)O[C@H](Cc2ccc(O[H])c(O[H])c2)C(=O)O)cc1O[H]
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.881 1.000 0.660 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.2409 -0.928097 16 8 Pose
OHD_TbNat_65
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=C/C(=O)O[C@H](Cc2ccc(O[H])c(O[H])c2)C(=O)O)cc1O[H]
T07
native IFP available
T07
selection_import_t07
0.862 1.000 0.607 native_similarity final_rank_score -32.7784 -1.29084 20 8 Pose
OHD_TbNat_65
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=C/C(=O)O[C@H](Cc2ccc(O[H])c(O[H])c2)C(=O)O)cc1O[H]
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.862 1.000 0.607 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.6814 -1.03572 19 9 Pose
OHD_TbNat_65
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=C/C(=O)O[C@H](Cc2ccc(O[H])c(O[H])c2)C(=O)O)cc1O[H]
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.829 1.000 0.512 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.9129 -1.25521 11 14 Pose
OHD_TbNat_65
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=C/C(=O)O[C@H](Cc2ccc(O[H])c(O[H])c2)C(=O)O)cc1O[H]
T14
native IFP available
T14
selection_import_t14
0.804 1.000 0.440 native_similarity final_rank_score -18.9062 -0.905021 13 11 Pose
OHD_TbNat_65
[H]Oc1ccc(/C=C/C(=O)O[C@H](Cc2ccc(O[H])c(O[H])c2)C(=O)O)cc1O[H]
T19
native IFP available
T19
selection_import_t19
0.764 1.000 0.326 native_similarity final_rank_score -30.5389 -1.21083 15 12 Pose