FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
6 compounds in matrix 12 best compound-target hits listed 10 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T08T11T14T16T17T18T19T20T21
OHD_TC2_88
[H]O[C@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)C(=CC[C@H]3[C@@H]4CC[C@H]([C@H](C)[N+]([H])([H])Cc5cn(Cc6ccccc6)nn5)[C@@]4(C)CC[C@@H]32)C1
0.896 0.815 7 0.83 0.85 0.77 0.81 0.79 0.76 0.90
OHD_TC2_8
[H][n+]1ccccc1[C@H]1CCN(c2nc(-c3ccccn3)nc3ccccc23)C1
0.859 0.859 1 0.86
OHD_TC2_88
[H]O[C@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)C(=CC[C@H]3[C@@H]4CC[C@H]([C@H](C)N([H])Cc5cn(Cc6ccccc6)nn5)[C@@]4(C)CC[C@@H]32)C1
0.817 0.817 1 0.82
OHD_TC2_8
[H][n+]1ccccc1[C@@H]1CCN(c2nc(-c3ccccn3)nc3ccccc23)C1
0.807 0.807 1 0.81
OHD_TC2_8
c1ccc(-c2nc(N3CC[C@H](c4ccccn4)C3)c3ccccc3n2)nc1
0.805 0.805 1 0.81
OHD_TC2_8
c1ccc(-c2nc(N3CC[C@@H](c4ccccn4)C3)c3ccccc3n2)nc1
0.710 0.710 1 0.71

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OHD_TC2_88
[H]O[C@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)C(=CC[C@H]3[C@@H]4CC[C@H]([C@H](C)[N+]([H])([H])Cc5cn(Cc6ccccc6)nn5)[C@@]4(C)CC[C@@H]32)C1
T21
native IFP available
T21
selection_import_t21
0.896 1.000 0.704 native_similarity final_rank_score -29.4513 -0.77582 18 7 Pose
OHD_TC2_8
[H][n+]1ccccc1[C@H]1CCN(c2nc(-c3ccccn3)nc3ccccc23)C1
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.859 1.000 0.597 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.0355 -0.897155 12 2 Pose
OHD_TC2_88
[H]O[C@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)C(=CC[C@H]3[C@@H]4CC[C@H]([C@H](C)[N+]([H])([H])Cc5cn(Cc6ccccc6)nn5)[C@@]4(C)CC[C@@H]32)C1
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.850 1.000 0.571 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.3614 -0.680581 13 4 Pose
OHD_TC2_88
[H]O[C@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)C(=CC[C@H]3[C@@H]4CC[C@H]([C@H](C)[N+]([H])([H])Cc5cn(Cc6ccccc6)nn5)[C@@]4(C)CC[C@@H]32)C1
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.827 1.000 0.507 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.3864 -0.718329 18 4 Pose
OHD_TC2_88
[H]O[C@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)C(=CC[C@H]3[C@@H]4CC[C@H]([C@H](C)N([H])Cc5cn(Cc6ccccc6)nn5)[C@@]4(C)CC[C@@H]32)C1
T20
native IFP available
T20
selection_import_t20
0.817 1.000 0.478 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.0185 -0.57024 12 5 Pose
OHD_TC2_88
[H]O[C@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)C(=CC[C@H]3[C@@H]4CC[C@H]([C@H](C)[N+]([H])([H])Cc5cn(Cc6ccccc6)nn5)[C@@]4(C)CC[C@@H]32)C1
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.807 1.000 0.450 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.6729 -0.704469 18 4 Pose
OHD_TC2_8
[H][n+]1ccccc1[C@@H]1CCN(c2nc(-c3ccccn3)nc3ccccc23)C1
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.807 1.000 0.449 native_similarity final_rank_score -32.3952 -1.28291 17 4 Pose
OHD_TC2_8
c1ccc(-c2nc(N3CC[C@H](c4ccccn4)C3)c3ccccc3n2)nc1
T20
native IFP available
T20
selection_import_t20
0.805 1.000 0.443 native_similarity final_rank_score -18.0586 -0.722932 9 3 Pose
OHD_TC2_88
[H]O[C@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)C(=CC[C@H]3[C@@H]4CC[C@H]([C@H](C)[N+]([H])([H])Cc5cn(Cc6ccccc6)nn5)[C@@]4(C)CC[C@@H]32)C1
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.789 1.000 0.396 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.3613 -0.677487 18 6 Pose
OHD_TC2_88
[H]O[C@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)C(=CC[C@H]3[C@@H]4CC[C@H]([C@H](C)[N+]([H])([H])Cc5cn(Cc6ccccc6)nn5)[C@@]4(C)CC[C@@H]32)C1
T14
native IFP available
T14
selection_import_t14
0.774 1.000 0.353 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.4979 -0.610939 13 7 Pose
OHD_TC2_88
[H]O[C@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)C(=CC[C@H]3[C@@H]4CC[C@H]([C@H](C)[N+]([H])([H])Cc5cn(Cc6ccccc6)nn5)[C@@]4(C)CC[C@@H]32)C1
T18
native IFP available
T18
selection_import_t18
0.761 1.000 0.317 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.1846 -0.601922 12 3 Pose
OHD_TC2_8
c1ccc(-c2nc(N3CC[C@@H](c4ccccn4)C3)c3ccccc3n2)nc1
T19
native IFP available
T19
selection_import_t19
0.710 1.000 0.171 native_similarity final_rank_score -31.4742 -1.19338 20 1 Pose