FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
2 compounds in matrix 8 best compound-target hits listed 8 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T09T11T12T15T16T17T20
OHD_TC1_54
[H]N(Cc1ccc(-c2nc(-c3cccnc3)no2)cc1)S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N2CCN(C)CC2)cc1
0.929 0.845 6 0.84 0.89 0.93 0.82 0.73 0.86
OHD_TC1_54
[H]N(Cc1ccc(-c2nc(-c3cccnc3)no2)cc1)S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N2CC[N+]([H])(C)CC2)cc1
0.871 0.833 2 0.87 0.80

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OHD_TC1_54
[H]N(Cc1ccc(-c2nc(-c3cccnc3)no2)cc1)S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N2CCN(C)CC2)cc1
T12
native IFP available
T12
selection_import_t12
0.929 1.000 0.797 native_similarity final_rank_score -30.7842 -0.891311 19 11 Pose
OHD_TC1_54
[H]N(Cc1ccc(-c2nc(-c3cccnc3)no2)cc1)S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N2CCN(C)CC2)cc1
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.889 1.000 0.683 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.5273 -0.765524 19 5 Pose
OHD_TC1_54
[H]N(Cc1ccc(-c2nc(-c3cccnc3)no2)cc1)S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N2CC[N+]([H])(C)CC2)cc1
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.871 1.000 0.630 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.5614 -0.73825 17 2 Pose
OHD_TC1_54
[H]N(Cc1ccc(-c2nc(-c3cccnc3)no2)cc1)S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N2CCN(C)CC2)cc1
T20
native IFP available
T20
selection_import_t20
0.857 1.000 0.591 native_similarity final_rank_score -18.289 -0.547099 11 5 Pose
OHD_TC1_54
[H]N(Cc1ccc(-c2nc(-c3cccnc3)no2)cc1)S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N2CCN(C)CC2)cc1
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.841 1.000 0.545 native_similarity final_rank_score -29.3628 -0.812994 22 7 Pose
OHD_TC1_54
[H]N(Cc1ccc(-c2nc(-c3cccnc3)no2)cc1)S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N2CCN(C)CC2)cc1
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.824 1.000 0.498 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.5171 -0.688759 16 7 Pose
OHD_TC1_54
[H]N(Cc1ccc(-c2nc(-c3cccnc3)no2)cc1)S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N2CC[N+]([H])(C)CC2)cc1
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.796 1.000 0.417 native_similarity final_rank_score -15.5512 -0.724407 22 4 Pose
OHD_TC1_54
[H]N(Cc1ccc(-c2nc(-c3cccnc3)no2)cc1)S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N2CCN(C)CC2)cc1
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.731 1.000 0.230 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.0403 -0.652079 12 8 Pose