FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
3 compounds in matrix 5 best compound-target hits listed 5 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T03T09T14T16T17
OHD_TC1_242
[H]O[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)[C@H](CC[C@H]3[C@@H]4CC[C@@H]([C@H](C)CCc5cc([C@@H](O[H])[C@H]6C[C@@H]7CC[N@@+]6([H])C[C@@H]7C=C)c6cc(OC)ccc6[n+]5[H])[C@@]4(C)CC[C@@H]32)C1
0.835 0.835 1 0.83
OHD_TC1_242
[H]O[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)[C@H](CC[C@@H]3[C@@H]2CC[C@]2(C)[C@@H]([C@H](C)CCc4cc([C@@H](O[H])[C@H]5C[C@@H]6CC[N@@+]5([H])C[C@@H]6C=C)c5cc(OC)ccc5[n+]4[H])CC[C@@H]32)C1
0.815 0.798 2 0.82 0.78
OHD_TC1_242
[H]O[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)[C@H](CC[C@H]3[C@@H]4CC[C@@H]([C@H](C)CCc5cc([C@@H](O[H])[C@H]6C[C@@H]7CC[N@@+]6([H])C[C@@H]7C=C)c6cc(OC)ccc6n5)[C@@]4(C)CC[C@@H]32)C1
0.802 0.791 2 0.78 0.80

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OHD_TC1_242
[H]O[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)[C@H](CC[C@H]3[C@@H]4CC[C@@H]([C@H](C)CCc5cc([C@@H](O[H])[C@H]6C[C@@H]7CC[N@@+]6([H])C[C@@H]7C=C)c6cc(OC)ccc6[n+]5[H])[C@@]4(C)CC[C@@H]32)C1
T14
native IFP available
T14
selection_import_t14
0.835 1.000 0.529 native_similarity final_rank_score -16.6432 -0.504479 18 4 Pose
OHD_TC1_242
[H]O[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)[C@H](CC[C@@H]3[C@@H]2CC[C@]2(C)[C@@H]([C@H](C)CCc4cc([C@@H](O[H])[C@H]5C[C@@H]6CC[N@@+]5([H])C[C@@H]6C=C)c5cc(OC)ccc5[n+]4[H])CC[C@@H]32)C1
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.815 1.000 0.472 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.3828 -0.476227 16 3 Pose
OHD_TC1_242
[H]O[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)[C@H](CC[C@H]3[C@@H]4CC[C@@H]([C@H](C)CCc5cc([C@@H](O[H])[C@H]6C[C@@H]7CC[N@@+]6([H])C[C@@H]7C=C)c6cc(OC)ccc6n5)[C@@]4(C)CC[C@@H]32)C1
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.802 1.000 0.436 native_similarity final_rank_score -15.5487 -0.583857 18 2 Pose
OHD_TC1_242
[H]O[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)[C@H](CC[C@@H]3[C@@H]2CC[C@]2(C)[C@@H]([C@H](C)CCc4cc([C@@H](O[H])[C@H]5C[C@@H]6CC[N@@+]5([H])C[C@@H]6C=C)c5cc(OC)ccc5[n+]4[H])CC[C@@H]32)C1
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.781 1.000 0.375 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.1345 -0.532681 21 3 Pose
OHD_TC1_242
[H]O[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(C)[C@H](CC[C@H]3[C@@H]4CC[C@@H]([C@H](C)CCc5cc([C@@H](O[H])[C@H]6C[C@@H]7CC[N@@+]6([H])C[C@@H]7C=C)c6cc(OC)ccc6n5)[C@@]4(C)CC[C@@H]32)C1
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.780 1.000 0.370 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.5485 -0.613786 15 2 Pose