FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
1 compounds in matrix 8 best compound-target hits listed 8 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T06T09T11T13T14T18
OHD_TC1_128
[H]N(CC[C@H]1CC[N@@+]([H])(Cc2ccccc2)CC1)C(=O)N([H])c1ncc(-c2ccc3c(c2)OCO3)n1[H]
0.896 0.839 8 0.83 0.88 0.83 0.79 0.88 0.90 0.82 0.80

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OHD_TC1_128
[H]N(CC[C@H]1CC[N@@+]([H])(Cc2ccccc2)CC1)C(=O)N([H])c1ncc(-c2ccc3c(c2)OCO3)n1[H]
T13
native IFP available
T13
selection_import_t13
0.896 1.000 0.702 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.0017 -0.842886 20 9 Pose
OHD_TC1_128
[H]N(CC[C@H]1CC[N@@+]([H])(Cc2ccccc2)CC1)C(=O)N([H])c1ncc(-c2ccc3c(c2)OCO3)n1[H]
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.882 1.000 0.662 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.824 -0.813527 20 10 Pose
OHD_TC1_128
[H]N(CC[C@H]1CC[N@@+]([H])(Cc2ccccc2)CC1)C(=O)N([H])c1ncc(-c2ccc3c(c2)OCO3)n1[H]
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.876 1.000 0.646 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.1958 -0.906175 20 4 Pose
OHD_TC1_128
[H]N(CC[C@H]1CC[N@@+]([H])(Cc2ccccc2)CC1)C(=O)N([H])c1ncc(-c2ccc3c(c2)OCO3)n1[H]
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.832 1.000 0.519 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.8317 -0.837603 17 4 Pose
OHD_TC1_128
[H]N(CC[C@H]1CC[N@@+]([H])(Cc2ccccc2)CC1)C(=O)N([H])c1ncc(-c2ccc3c(c2)OCO3)n1[H]
T06
native IFP available
T06
selection_import_t06
0.827 1.000 0.504 native_similarity final_rank_score -11.4298 -0.691133 22 2 Pose
OHD_TC1_128
[H]N(CC[C@H]1CC[N@@+]([H])(Cc2ccccc2)CC1)C(=O)N([H])c1ncc(-c2ccc3c(c2)OCO3)n1[H]
T14
native IFP available
T14
selection_import_t14
0.818 1.000 0.480 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.1159 -0.670651 14 4 Pose
OHD_TC1_128
[H]N(CC[C@H]1CC[N@@+]([H])(Cc2ccccc2)CC1)C(=O)N([H])c1ncc(-c2ccc3c(c2)OCO3)n1[H]
T18
native IFP available
T18
selection_import_t18
0.797 1.000 0.419 native_similarity final_rank_score -18.5063 -0.637874 13 4 Pose
OHD_TC1_128
[H]N(CC[C@H]1CC[N@@+]([H])(Cc2ccccc2)CC1)C(=O)N([H])c1ncc(-c2ccc3c(c2)OCO3)n1[H]
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.788 1.000 0.394 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.3996 -0.880164 17 5 Pose