FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
1 compounds in matrix 8 best compound-target hits listed 8 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T03T05T10T15T17T19
NMT-TY0953
[H]N([H])c1cccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c2c(N([H])[H])n([H])c(SCC)nc2=O)c1
0.849 0.800 8 0.80 0.80 0.82 0.83 0.85 0.80 0.76 0.75

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
NMT-TY0953
[H]N([H])c1cccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c2c(N([H])[H])n([H])c(SCC)nc2=O)c1
T10
native IFP available
T10
selection_import_t10
0.849 1.000 0.569 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.913 -1.16966 13 13 Pose
NMT-TY0953
[H]N([H])c1cccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c2c(N([H])[H])n([H])c(SCC)nc2=O)c1
T05
native IFP available
T05
selection_import_t05
0.834 1.000 0.527 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.7606 -1.29433 14 8 Pose
NMT-TY0953
[H]N([H])c1cccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c2c(N([H])[H])n([H])c(SCC)nc2=O)c1
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.817 1.000 0.476 native_similarity final_rank_score -30.0855 -1.36833 14 6 Pose
NMT-TY0953
[H]N([H])c1cccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c2c(N([H])[H])n([H])c(SCC)nc2=O)c1
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.804 1.000 0.441 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.9186 -1.28494 16 9 Pose
NMT-TY0953
[H]N([H])c1cccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c2c(N([H])[H])n([H])c(SCC)nc2=O)c1
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.798 1.000 0.423 native_similarity final_rank_score -30.1527 -1.37094 14 6 Pose
NMT-TY0953
[H]N([H])c1cccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c2c(N([H])[H])n([H])c(SCC)nc2=O)c1
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.798 1.000 0.423 native_similarity final_rank_score -30.346 -1.37003 14 7 Pose
NMT-TY0953
[H]N([H])c1cccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c2c(N([H])[H])n([H])c(SCC)nc2=O)c1
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.756 1.000 0.302 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.0457 -1.13545 17 10 Pose
NMT-TY0953
[H]N([H])c1cccc(S(=O)(=O)N([H])c2c(N([H])[H])n([H])c(SCC)nc2=O)c1
T19
native IFP available
T19
selection_import_t19
0.747 1.000 0.278 native_similarity final_rank_score -31.3269 -1.44185 19 8 Pose