FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
1 compounds in matrix 9 best compound-target hits listed 9 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T06T08T09T11T12T15T17
NMT-TY0949
[H]/N=c1\c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc(N([H])[H])c2)c(O)nc(SCCCCCC)n1[H]
0.918 0.841 9 0.84 0.81 0.92 0.89 0.77 0.89 0.89 0.80 0.77

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
NMT-TY0949
[H]/N=c1\c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc(N([H])[H])c2)c(O)nc(SCCCCCC)n1[H]
T06
native IFP available
T06
selection_import_t06
0.918 1.000 0.767 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.3579 -0.908297 20 6 Pose
NMT-TY0949
[H]/N=c1\c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc(N([H])[H])c2)c(O)nc(SCCCCCC)n1[H]
T12
native IFP available
T12
selection_import_t12
0.888 1.000 0.680 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.94 -1.03529 14 10 Pose
NMT-TY0949
[H]/N=c1\c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc(N([H])[H])c2)c(O)nc(SCCCCCC)n1[H]
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.887 1.000 0.677 native_similarity final_rank_score -32.0593 -1.24825 16 12 Pose
NMT-TY0949
[H]/N=c1\c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc(N([H])[H])c2)c(O)nc(SCCCCCC)n1[H]
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.886 1.000 0.674 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.408 -0.939746 14 9 Pose
NMT-TY0949
[H]/N=c1\c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc(N([H])[H])c2)c(O)nc(SCCCCCC)n1[H]
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.840 1.000 0.543 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.6795 -1.02254 14 7 Pose
NMT-TY0949
[H]/N=c1\c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc(N([H])[H])c2)c(O)nc(SCCCCCC)n1[H]
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.806 1.000 0.446 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.2992 -1.04478 16 5 Pose
NMT-TY0949
[H]/N=c1\c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc(N([H])[H])c2)c(O)nc(SCCCCCC)n1[H]
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.797 1.000 0.419 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.1242 -0.935536 13 7 Pose
NMT-TY0949
[H]/N=c1\c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc(N([H])[H])c2)c(O)nc(SCCCCCC)n1[H]
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.771 1.000 0.347 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.5463 -1.02694 15 9 Pose
NMT-TY0949
[H]/N=c1\c(N([H])S(=O)(=O)c2cccc(N([H])[H])c2)c(O)nc(SCCCCCC)n1[H]
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.771 1.000 0.345 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.8265 -0.875287 18 12 Pose