FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB SELECTIONExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
1 compounds in matrix 11 best compound-target hits listed 11 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T06T08T09T10T11T12T13T16T18T20
NMT-TY0620
[H]N([H])c1nc(SC/C=C/c2ccccc2)nc(O)c1N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N([H])C(C)=O)cc1
0.953 0.866 11 0.85 0.85 0.87 0.82 0.91 0.88 0.91 0.86 0.80 0.82 0.95

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
NMT-TY0620
[H]N([H])c1nc(SC/C=C/c2ccccc2)nc(O)c1N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N([H])C(C)=O)cc1
T20
native IFP available
T20
selection_import_t20
0.953 1.000 0.867 native_similarity final_rank_score -14.0022 -0.623323 12 6 Pose
NMT-TY0620
[H]N([H])c1nc(SC/C=C/c2ccccc2)nc(O)c1N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N([H])C(C)=O)cc1
T12
native IFP available
T12
selection_import_t12
0.911 1.000 0.747 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.5548 -1.00253 18 11 Pose
NMT-TY0620
[H]N([H])c1nc(SC/C=C/c2ccccc2)nc(O)c1N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N([H])C(C)=O)cc1
T10
native IFP available
T10
selection_import_t10
0.910 1.000 0.742 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.5546 -0.767932 21 10 Pose
NMT-TY0620
[H]N([H])c1nc(SC/C=C/c2ccccc2)nc(O)c1N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N([H])C(C)=O)cc1
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.881 1.000 0.659 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.8063 -0.769904 16 7 Pose
NMT-TY0620
[H]N([H])c1nc(SC/C=C/c2ccccc2)nc(O)c1N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N([H])C(C)=O)cc1
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.874 1.000 0.641 native_similarity final_rank_score -32.8605 -1.0223 15 10 Pose
NMT-TY0620
[H]N([H])c1nc(SC/C=C/c2ccccc2)nc(O)c1N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N([H])C(C)=O)cc1
T13
native IFP available
T13
selection_import_t13
0.862 1.000 0.605 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.0567 -0.910892 21 7 Pose
NMT-TY0620
[H]N([H])c1nc(SC/C=C/c2ccccc2)nc(O)c1N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N([H])C(C)=O)cc1
T06
native IFP available
T06
selection_import_t06
0.846 1.000 0.560 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.6042 -0.766429 20 2 Pose
NMT-TY0620
[H]N([H])c1nc(SC/C=C/c2ccccc2)nc(O)c1N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N([H])C(C)=O)cc1
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.845 1.000 0.559 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.6969 -0.830769 19 7 Pose
NMT-TY0620
[H]N([H])c1nc(SC/C=C/c2ccccc2)nc(O)c1N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N([H])C(C)=O)cc1
T18
native IFP available
T18
selection_import_t18
0.824 1.000 0.498 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.6638 -0.72501 16 5 Pose
NMT-TY0620
[H]N([H])c1nc(SC/C=C/c2ccccc2)nc(O)c1N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N([H])C(C)=O)cc1
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.819 1.000 0.483 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.3677 -0.860388 17 5 Pose
NMT-TY0620
[H]N([H])c1nc(SC/C=C/c2ccccc2)nc(O)c1N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(N([H])C(C)=O)cc1
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.795 1.000 0.414 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.3245 -0.713197 16 7 Pose