FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB Docking_panel_21Explorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
4 compounds in matrix 10 best compound-target hits listed 10 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T02T03T09T10T13T15T16T18T19T20
Z56784490
[H]N(/N=C/c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C(=O)[C@@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)c1cccs1
0.946 0.844 4 0.89 0.80 0.74 0.95
Z56784490
[H]N(C(=O)c1cccs1)[C@@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)/C(O)=N/N=C\c1ccc(Cl)cc1
0.866 0.866 1 0.87
Z56784490
[H]N(/N=C/c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C(=O)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)c1cccs1
0.846 0.842 2 0.84 0.85
Z56784490
[H]N(C(=O)c1cccs1)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)/C(O)=N/N=C\c1ccc(Cl)cc1
0.820 0.789 3 0.82 0.79 0.76

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
Z56784490
[H]N(/N=C/c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C(=O)[C@@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)c1cccs1
T20
native IFP available
T20
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T20
0.946 1.000 0.846 native_similarity final_rank_score -16.4879 -0.608214 13 6 Pose
Z56784490
[H]N(/N=C/c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C(=O)[C@@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)c1cccs1
T02
native IFP available
T02
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T02
0.886 0.990 0.693 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.1944 -0.83604 19 1 Pose
Z56784490
[H]N(C(=O)c1cccs1)[C@@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)/C(O)=N/N=C\c1ccc(Cl)cc1
T10
native IFP available
T10
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T10
0.866 1.000 0.618 native_similarity final_rank_score -18.2517 -0.70689 14 11 Pose
Z56784490
[H]N(/N=C/c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C(=O)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)c1cccs1
T13
native IFP available
T13
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T13
0.846 1.000 0.560 native_similarity final_rank_score -18.085 -0.746834 17 4 Pose
Z56784490
[H]N(/N=C/c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C(=O)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)c1cccs1
T03
native IFP available
T03
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T03
0.837 1.000 0.535 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.3199 -1.02439 19 2 Pose
Z56784490
[H]N(C(=O)c1cccs1)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)/C(O)=N/N=C\c1ccc(Cl)cc1
T09
native IFP available
T09
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T09
0.820 1.000 0.487 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.8433 -0.793746 16 2 Pose
Z56784490
[H]N(/N=C/c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C(=O)[C@@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)c1cccs1
T18
native IFP available
T18
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T18
0.800 0.989 0.448 native_similarity final_rank_score -14.0977 -0.600255 11 5 Pose
Z56784490
[H]N(C(=O)c1cccs1)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)/C(O)=N/N=C\c1ccc(Cl)cc1
T15
native IFP available
T15
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T15
0.786 1.000 0.388 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.4383 -0.71333 16 5 Pose
Z56784490
[H]N(C(=O)c1cccs1)[C@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)/C(O)=N/N=C\c1ccc(Cl)cc1
T16
native IFP available
T16
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T16
0.760 1.000 0.315 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.7784 -0.679422 15 2 Pose
Z56784490
[H]N(/N=C/c1ccc(Cl)cc1)C(=O)[C@@H](Cc1cn([H])c2ccccc12)N([H])C(=O)c1cccs1
T19
native IFP available
T19
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T19
0.745 1.000 0.270 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.44 -0.993488 23 6 Pose