FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
2 compounds in matrix 7 best compound-target hits listed 7 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T04T05T06T08T10T21T22
Z31546448
[H]N(C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1)N([H])C(=O)[C@H](CCSC)N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(C)cc1
0.873 0.852 3 0.81 0.87 0.87
Z31546448
[H]N(C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H](CCSC)NS(=O)(=O)c1ccc(C)cc1
0.859 0.849 4 0.86 0.84 0.84 0.85

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
Z31546448
[H]N(C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1)N([H])C(=O)[C@H](CCSC)N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(C)cc1
T10
native IFP available
T10
selection_import_t10
0.873 1.000 0.636 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.9464 -0.755466 14 11 Pose
Z31546448
[H]N(C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1)N([H])C(=O)[C@H](CCSC)N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(C)cc1
T22
native IFP available
T22
selection_import_t22
0.872 1.000 0.633 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.3 -0.962162 24 11 Pose
Z31546448
[H]N(C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H](CCSC)NS(=O)(=O)c1ccc(C)cc1
T05
native IFP available
T05
selection_import_t05
0.859 1.000 0.596 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.1642 -0.880014 16 10 Pose
Z31546448
[H]N(C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H](CCSC)NS(=O)(=O)c1ccc(C)cc1
T21
native IFP available
T21
selection_import_t21
0.855 1.000 0.584 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.0705 -0.732557 15 8 Pose
Z31546448
[H]N(C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H](CCSC)NS(=O)(=O)c1ccc(C)cc1
T06
native IFP available
T06
selection_import_t06
0.845 1.000 0.557 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.2539 -0.734099 21 4 Pose
Z31546448
[H]N(C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1)N([H])C(=O)[C@@H](CCSC)NS(=O)(=O)c1ccc(C)cc1
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.838 1.000 0.538 native_similarity final_rank_score -32.2042 -1.01581 16 14 Pose
Z31546448
[H]N(C(=O)c1csc(N2CCOCC2)n1)N([H])C(=O)[C@H](CCSC)N([H])S(=O)(=O)c1ccc(C)cc1
T04
native IFP available
T04
selection_import_t04
0.813 1.000 0.465 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.4 -0.733808 11 2 Pose