FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
3 compounds in matrix 5 best compound-target hits listed 5 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T03T11T17
Z2009870667
[H]OC(=O)CC1(CS[C@H](CCc2ccccc2C(C)(C)O[H])c2cccc(/C=C/c3ccc4ccc(Cl)cc4n3)c2)CC1
0.884 0.884 1 0.88
Z2009870667
[H]OC(=O)CC1(CS[C@H](CCc2ccccc2C(C)(C)O[H])c2cccc(/C=C\c3ccc4ccc(Cl)cc4n3)c2)CC1
0.845 0.845 1 0.84
Z2009870667
[H]OC(=O)CC1(CS[C@@H](CCc2ccccc2C(C)(C)O[H])c2cccc(/C=C/c3ccc4ccc(Cl)cc4n3)c2)CC1
0.844 0.823 3 0.84 0.81 0.81

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
Z2009870667
[H]OC(=O)CC1(CS[C@H](CCc2ccccc2C(C)(C)O[H])c2cccc(/C=C/c3ccc4ccc(Cl)cc4n3)c2)CC1
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.884 1.000 0.669 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.3152 -0.605704 17 3 Pose
Z2009870667
[H]OC(=O)CC1(CS[C@H](CCc2ccccc2C(C)(C)O[H])c2cccc(/C=C\c3ccc4ccc(Cl)cc4n3)c2)CC1
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.845 1.000 0.556 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.3781 -0.706909 21 2 Pose
Z2009870667
[H]OC(=O)CC1(CS[C@@H](CCc2ccccc2C(C)(C)O[H])c2cccc(/C=C/c3ccc4ccc(Cl)cc4n3)c2)CC1
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.844 1.000 0.555 native_similarity final_rank_score -28.3752 -0.706926 19 4 Pose
Z2009870667
[H]OC(=O)CC1(CS[C@@H](CCc2ccccc2C(C)(C)O[H])c2cccc(/C=C/c3ccc4ccc(Cl)cc4n3)c2)CC1
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.813 1.000 0.466 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.6473 -0.632017 22 2 Pose
Z2009870667
[H]OC(=O)CC1(CS[C@@H](CCc2ccccc2C(C)(C)O[H])c2cccc(/C=C/c3ccc4ccc(Cl)cc4n3)c2)CC1
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.810 1.000 0.458 native_similarity final_rank_score -17.0672 -0.556944 23 3 Pose