FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
6 compounds in matrix 13 best compound-target hits listed 13 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T02T03T05T08T09T11T14T15T16T17T18T20T22
OSA_Lib_316
[H][N+]([H])([H])Cc1ccc(CN(C)[C@]23C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H](C[N+]([H])([H])C2)[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)cc1
0.953 0.861 2 0.77 0.95
OSA_Lib_316
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(C[N+]([H])([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
0.863 0.837 5 0.82 0.86 0.84 0.86 0.81
OSA_Lib_316
[H]N([H])Cc1ccc(CN(C)[C@]23C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H](C[N+]([H])([H])C2)[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)cc1
0.839 0.806 2 0.77 0.84
OSA_Lib_316
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@](N(C)Cc3ccc(C[N+]([H])([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
0.836 0.836 1 0.84
OSA_Lib_316
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(C[N+]([H])([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
0.801 0.798 2 0.80 0.80
OSA_Lib_316
[H][N+]([H])([H])Cc1ccc(CN(C)[C@@]23C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@@H](C[N+]([H])([H])C2)[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)cc1
0.780 0.780 1 0.78

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OSA_Lib_316
[H][N+]([H])([H])Cc1ccc(CN(C)[C@]23C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H](C[N+]([H])([H])C2)[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)cc1
T20
native IFP available
T20
selection_import_t20
0.953 1.000 0.867 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.4711 -0.634846 12 3 Pose
OSA_Lib_316
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(C[N+]([H])([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.863 1.000 0.607 native_similarity final_rank_score -30.2859 -1.02026 21 4 Pose
OSA_Lib_316
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(C[N+]([H])([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.857 1.000 0.591 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.9 -0.961676 18 4 Pose
OSA_Lib_316
[H]N([H])Cc1ccc(CN(C)[C@]23C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H](C[N+]([H])([H])C2)[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)cc1
T22
native IFP available
T22
selection_import_t22
0.839 1.000 0.541 native_similarity final_rank_score -30.7953 -1.09573 22 5 Pose
OSA_Lib_316
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(C[N+]([H])([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T05
native IFP available
T05
selection_import_t05
0.838 1.000 0.537 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.939 -0.881218 17 4 Pose
OSA_Lib_316
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@](N(C)Cc3ccc(C[N+]([H])([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.836 1.000 0.532 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.3514 -0.815062 20 3 Pose
OSA_Lib_316
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(C[N+]([H])([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.820 1.000 0.486 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.4296 -0.95211 24 2 Pose
OSA_Lib_316
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(C[N+]([H])([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T11
native IFP available
T11
selection_import_t11
0.807 1.000 0.450 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.6775 -0.938418 20 2 Pose
OSA_Lib_316
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(C[N+]([H])([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.801 1.000 0.431 native_similarity final_rank_score -30.1842 -1.04391 17 1 Pose
OSA_Lib_316
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(C[N+]([H])([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.795 1.000 0.414 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.6266 -0.803506 16 3 Pose
OSA_Lib_316
[H][N+]([H])([H])Cc1ccc(CN(C)[C@@]23C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@@H](C[N+]([H])([H])C2)[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)cc1
T14
native IFP available
T14
selection_import_t14
0.780 1.000 0.372 native_similarity final_rank_score -18.5636 -0.686235 14 4 Pose
OSA_Lib_316
[H]N([H])Cc1ccc(CN(C)[C@]23C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H](C[N+]([H])([H])C2)[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)cc1
T18
native IFP available
T18
selection_import_t18
0.774 1.000 0.353 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.9757 -0.732981 14 6 Pose
OSA_Lib_316
[H][N+]([H])([H])Cc1ccc(CN(C)[C@]23C[C@H](c4ccccc4)[C@H](C[N+]([H])([H])C2)[C@H](c2ccccc2)C3)cc1
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.768 1.000 0.337 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.7562 -0.853496 16 3 Pose