FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB Docking_panel_21Explorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
4 compounds in matrix 8 best compound-target hits listed 8 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T02T03T08T09T14T15T16T18
OSA_Lib_301
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(N([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
0.870 0.850 4 0.87 0.86 0.87 0.80
OSA_Lib_301
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@](N(C)Cc3ccc(N([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
0.852 0.852 1 0.85
OSA_Lib_301
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(N([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
0.837 0.815 2 0.79 0.84
OSA_Lib_301
[H]N1C[C@@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@@]([N@@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(N([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
0.789 0.789 1 0.79

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OSA_Lib_301
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(N([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T02
native IFP available
T02
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T02
0.870 0.997 0.635 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.905 -0.814627 23 4 Pose
OSA_Lib_301
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(N([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T09
native IFP available
T09
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T09
0.867 1.000 0.620 native_similarity final_rank_score -29.4287 -0.921145 20 2 Pose
OSA_Lib_301
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(N([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T03
native IFP available
T03
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T03
0.859 1.000 0.598 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.4052 -0.873469 21 2 Pose
OSA_Lib_301
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@](N(C)Cc3ccc(N([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T15
native IFP available
T15
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T15
0.852 1.000 0.577 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.5349 -0.675788 15 2 Pose
OSA_Lib_301
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(N([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T16
native IFP available
T16
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T16
0.837 1.000 0.534 native_similarity final_rank_score -20.096 -0.716404 16 3 Pose
OSA_Lib_301
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(N([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T14
native IFP available
T14
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T14
0.804 1.000 0.440 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.9277 -0.716963 13 5 Pose
OSA_Lib_301
[H]N1C[C@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@]([N@@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(N([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T08
native IFP available
T08
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T08
0.793 1.000 0.408 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.8143 -0.70206 12 2 Pose
OSA_Lib_301
[H]N1C[C@@H]2[C@@H](c3ccccc3)C[C@@]([N@@+]([H])(C)Cc3ccc(N([H])[H])cc3)(C[C@H]2c2ccccc2)C1
T18
native IFP available
T18
dockmulti_91311c650f2e_T18
0.789 1.000 0.397 native_similarity final_rank_score -16.9117 -0.529228 15 3 Pose