FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
2 compounds in matrix 9 best compound-target hits listed 9 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T03T08T09T15T16T17T18
OHD_TB2019_4
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCC[N+]3([H])CCN(C4CCCC4)CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
0.865 0.829 6 0.84 0.82 0.87 0.85 0.82 0.77
OHD_TB2019_4
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCC[N@+]3([H])CC[N@+]([H])(C4CCCC4)CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
0.859 0.826 3 0.86 0.83 0.79

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
OHD_TB2019_4
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCC[N+]3([H])CCN(C4CCCC4)CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.865 1.000 0.615 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.2502 -0.771609 22 1 Pose
OHD_TB2019_4
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCC[N@+]3([H])CC[N@+]([H])(C4CCCC4)CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.859 1.000 0.597 native_similarity final_rank_score -35.5083 -1.04795 18 2 Pose
OHD_TB2019_4
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCC[N+]3([H])CCN(C4CCCC4)CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.852 1.000 0.576 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.4793 -0.721238 20 2 Pose
OHD_TB2019_4
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCC[N+]3([H])CCN(C4CCCC4)CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.844 1.000 0.555 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.4071 -0.801293 19 3 Pose
OHD_TB2019_4
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCC[N@+]3([H])CC[N@+]([H])(C4CCCC4)CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.827 1.000 0.507 native_similarity final_rank_score -21.1975 -0.675491 18 2 Pose
OHD_TB2019_4
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCC[N+]3([H])CCN(C4CCCC4)CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.823 1.000 0.493 native_similarity final_rank_score -30.7053 -0.778345 17 4 Pose
OHD_TB2019_4
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCC[N+]3([H])CCN(C4CCCC4)CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T15
native IFP available
T15
selection_import_t15
0.820 1.000 0.485 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.1536 -0.766988 17 4 Pose
OHD_TB2019_4
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCC[N@+]3([H])CC[N@+]([H])(C4CCCC4)CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T18
native IFP available
T18
selection_import_t18
0.793 1.000 0.408 native_similarity final_rank_score -19.9579 -0.598854 14 3 Pose
OHD_TB2019_4
[H]N1C(=O)/C(=C2/C(=N/OCC[N+]3([H])CCN(C4CCCC4)CC3)c3ccccc3N2[H])c2ccc(Br)cc21
T16
native IFP available
T16
selection_import_t16
0.769 1.000 0.340 native_similarity final_rank_score -18.2875 -0.654367 12 2 Pose