FAIRMol

Reverse docking explorer

Search one compound across many targets or scan the strongest compound-target pairs in the active database. The combined reverse-docking score uses a normalized docking-score estimator together with an interaction-fingerprint component.

DB fairmolExplorer results are being read from this database.
Reset
1 compounds in matrix 12 best compound-target hits listed 12 targets
• Combined reverse-docking score = 65% normalized docking-score estimator + 35% interaction-fingerprint component.
• When a native ligand exists for an experiment, the interaction-fingerprint component is driven by similarity to the native contact/H-bond pattern.
• When no native ligand exists, the interaction-fingerprint component falls back to contact richness within the experiment (normalized contacts and H-bonds).

Compounds × targets matrix

Each cell shows the best combined reverse-docking score found for that compound on that target. Blank cells mean no imported pose passed the current filters.
Compound Best Mean Targets T01T02T03T04T06T08T09T12T13T17T19T21
NMT-TY0943
[H]N([H])c1c(NS(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
0.890 0.821 12 0.79 0.78 0.85 0.80 0.87 0.86 0.77 0.85 0.89 0.78 0.75 0.87

Best compound-target hits

The score column is the combined reverse-docking score. The next two columns expose its components: normalized score-estimator and interaction fingerprint.
CompoundTargetExperimentCombinedScore partIFP partIFP modeMetricDock scoreInter normContactsHB
NMT-TY0943
[H]N([H])c1c(NS(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T13
native IFP available
T13
selection_import_t13
0.890 1.000 0.684 native_similarity final_rank_score -22.256 -0.9861 23 10 Pose
NMT-TY0943
[H]N([H])c1c(NS(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T21
native IFP available
T21
selection_import_t21
0.869 1.000 0.627 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.451 -0.845126 14 13 Pose
NMT-TY0943
[H]N([H])c1c(NS(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T06
native IFP available
T06
selection_import_t06
0.869 1.000 0.625 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.8294 -0.859526 17 4 Pose
NMT-TY0943
[H]N([H])c1c(NS(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T08
native IFP available
T08
selection_import_t08
0.858 1.000 0.593 native_similarity final_rank_score -34.6979 -1.16289 15 10 Pose
NMT-TY0943
[H]N([H])c1c(NS(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T12
native IFP available
T12
selection_import_t12
0.853 1.000 0.581 native_similarity final_rank_score -23.7962 -1.07823 13 10 Pose
NMT-TY0943
[H]N([H])c1c(NS(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T03
native IFP available
T03
selection_import_t03
0.845 1.000 0.558 native_similarity final_rank_score -25.9968 -0.967058 17 4 Pose
NMT-TY0943
[H]N([H])c1c(NS(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T04
native IFP available
T04
selection_import_t04
0.800 1.000 0.429 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.5786 -0.956826 13 1 Pose
NMT-TY0943
[H]N([H])c1c(NS(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T01
native IFP available
T01
selection_import_t01
0.788 1.000 0.393 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.2349 -1.0068 15 6 Pose
NMT-TY0943
[H]N([H])c1c(NS(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T17
native IFP available
T17
selection_import_t17
0.784 1.000 0.382 native_similarity final_rank_score -24.2166 -0.827695 20 8 Pose
NMT-TY0943
[H]N([H])c1c(NS(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T02
native IFP available
T02
selection_import_t02
0.777 1.000 0.363 native_similarity final_rank_score -27.1972 -0.978854 14 6 Pose
NMT-TY0943
[H]N([H])c1c(NS(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T09
native IFP available
T09
selection_import_t09
0.765 1.000 0.329 native_similarity final_rank_score -26.9955 -0.93103 12 10 Pose
NMT-TY0943
[H]N([H])c1c(NS(=O)(=O)c2cccc([N+](=O)O)c2)c(=O)nc(SCc2ccccc2)n1[H]
T19
native IFP available
T19
selection_import_t19
0.754 1.000 0.297 native_similarity final_rank_score -33.1271 -1.18094 21 8 Pose