FAIRMol

GemmaOHDUnisi_41

Pose ID 10586 Compound 1416 Pose 421

DB SELECTIONDocking pose analysis is being read from this database.
Molecular metrics status: done
RDKit SASA-based burial metrics are cached.
SASA cached
T16
T. brucei TR (Dimer interface (site 2)) T. brucei Dimer interface (site 2)
Ligand GemmaOHDUnisi_41
PDB6RB5

3D complex viewer

Strict H-bonds Permissive H-bonds
Viewer legend
Protein receptor
Pocket residues
Cofactor context
Docked ligand
Overall assessment
Weak SASA cached
Weak or marginal quality
Binding strong Geometry medium Native strong SASA done
Strain ΔE
18.4 kcal/mol
Protein clashes
4
Internal clashes
4
Native overlap
contact recall 0.83, Jaccard 0.56
Burial
77%
Hydrophobic fit
86%
Reason: no major geometry red flags detected
4 protein-contact clashes 4 intramolecular clashes
Molecular report
Full metrics ↗
Weak Marginal quality. Consider only alongside better-scoring alternatives.
✓ Excellent LE (-0.671 kcal/mol/HA) ✓ Good fit quality (FQ -6.77) ✓ Good H-bonds (3 bonds) ✓ Deep burial (77% SASA buried) ✓ Lipophilic contacts well-matched (86%) ✗ Moderate strain (18.4 kcal/mol) ✗ Geometry warnings ✗ Many internal clashes (17)
Score
-23.493
kcal/mol
LE
-0.671
kcal/mol/HA
Fit Quality
-6.77
FQ (Leeson)
HAC
35
heavy atoms
MW
462
Da
LogP
6.37
cLogP
Strain ΔE
18.4 kcal/mol
SASA buried
77%
Lipo contact
86% BSA apolar/total
SASA unbound
769 Ų
Apolar buried
512 Ų

Interaction summary

HB 3 HY 24 PI 2 CLASH 4
Final rank3.312Score-23.493
Inter norm-0.657Intra norm-0.014
Top1000noExcludedno
Contacts16H-bonds3
Artifact reasongeometry warning; 17 clashes; 1 protein clash
Residues
ALA209 ALA67 ALA77 ALA90 ARG74 ASP84 GLU82 GLY85 LEU73 LYS89 MET70 PHE83 PRO212 PRO213 TYR69 VAL88

Protein summary

493 residues
Protein targetT16Atoms7551
Residues493Chains1
Residue summaryVAL:768; LYS:704; LEU:703; ILE:532; GLU:450; THR:434; ARG:408; PHE:400; ALA:390; ASN:350; PRO:350; GLY:336; SER:319; TYR:294; ASP:276; MET:221

Receptor context

1 kept / 0 excluded
Receptor context filtering: interactions and SASA are computed against protein atoms plus allowed cofactors/ions. Native ligand-like HETATM partners are excluded from scoring.
Kept context 1 Excluded HETATM 0
Kept cofactors / ions
A:FAD501

Native ligand reference

★ reference
Interaction fingerprint calculated directly from the uploaded native ligand without docking. Current H-bond mode: strict.
Name6RB5Contacts12
PoseOpen native poseHB0
IFP residues
ALA90 ARG74 GLY85 LEU73 LYS89 MET70 PHE83 PRO212 PRO213 SER86 SER87 VAL88
Current overlap10Native recall0.83
Jaccard0.56RMSD-
HB strict0Strict recall-
HB same residue+role0HB role recall-
HB same residue0HB residue recall-

HB · H-bonds

Mode: strict. Count shows atom-level H-bonds; unique residues in summary: 0.

PI · π–π interactions

Native π–π recall is disabled because no explicit native π–π reference was stored.

HY · Hydrophobic contacts

CLASH · Clashes

All stored poses for this docking hit

PoseFinal rankInter normScoreHBCTCT overlapCT recallHB role rec.RMSDExcluded
360 1.9858794448475394 -0.60587 -22.5384 8 15 0 0.00 - - no Open
310 2.215876786266132 -0.810312 -26.2423 7 20 0 0.00 - - no Open
296 2.3735761215630813 -0.974129 -31.9318 5 22 0 0.00 - - no Open
304 2.4109016880892273 -0.837854 -29.8668 7 13 0 0.00 - - no Open
350 2.5106836985505296 -0.819328 -29.6374 5 17 0 0.00 - - no Open
350 2.9414702362290113 -0.751309 -27.9819 5 17 0 0.00 - - no Open
358 3.175808622050242 -0.595751 -15.5491 3 17 0 0.00 - - no Open
421 3.3117905327030788 -0.65678 -23.4933 3 16 10 0.83 - - no Current
340 3.408980607340969 -0.695149 -24.1764 7 10 0 0.00 - - no Open
387 3.5593066442778185 -0.749818 -29.818 7 21 0 0.00 - - no Open
384 3.6360066859245648 -0.841444 -26.102 8 16 1 0.08 - - no Open
458 3.684952783737684 -0.836742 -25.2904 4 18 0 0.00 - - no Open
341 4.458291848249892 -0.632747 -19.3542 9 19 0 0.00 - - no Open
340 4.6006376252543095 -0.940685 -33.7094 11 24 0 0.00 - - no Open
312 5.204738389636102 -0.790161 -23.6613 11 20 0 0.00 - - no Open

Molecular metrics

RDKit SASA burial, strain energy (MMFF94s), ligand efficiency and fit quality for this docking pose.
✓ Metrics available

Scoring & efficiency

Docking score -23.493kcal/mol
Ligand efficiency (LE) -0.6712kcal/mol/HA
Score / heavy atom count
Fit quality (FQ) -6.770
LE / (0.072 + 0.95/HAC) — Leeson & Springthorpe
Heavy atom count 35HA

Physicochemical properties

Molecular weight 461.5Da
Lipinski: ≤ 500 Da
LogP (cLogP) 6.37
Lipinski: ≤ 5
Rotatable bonds 9

Conformational strain (MMFF94s)

Strain energy (ΔE) 18.43kcal/mol
< 5 good · 5–10 marginal · > 10 problematic
Docked FF energy 103.72kcal/mol
Minimised FF energy 85.29kcal/mol

SASA & burial

✓ computed
SASA (unbound) 769.4Ų
Total solvent-accessible surface area of free ligand
BSA total 592.6Ų
Buried surface area upon binding
BSA apolar 511.8Ų
Hydrophobic contacts buried
BSA polar 80.8Ų
Polar contacts buried
Fraction buried 77.0%
> 60 % indicates good pocket engagement
Lipophilic contact ratio 86.4%
BSA apolar / BSA total — high = hydrophobic driver
Δ Non-polar SASA -3247.3Ų
SASA_nonpolar(complex) − SASA_nonpolar(receptor) − SASA_nonpolar(ligand free). Negative = non-polar surface buried upon binding. Requires full polarity-decomposed SASA computation.
Receptor non-polar SASA 4076.6Ų
Non-polar SASA of receptor alone (VdW proxy, nonpolar atoms only)
Complex non-polar SASA 1478.0Ų
Non-polar SASA of full complex (VdW proxy, nonpolar atoms only)