FAIRMol

ulfkktlib_3872

Pose ID 10487 Compound 4626 Pose 322

DB fairmolDocking pose analysis is being read from this database.
Molecular metrics status: done
RDKit SASA-based burial metrics are cached.
SASA cached
T16
T. brucei TR (Dimer interface (site 2)) T. brucei Dimer interface (site 2)
Ligand ulfkktlib_3872
PDB6RB5

3D complex viewer

Strict H-bonds Permissive H-bonds
Viewer legend
Protein receptor
Pocket residues
Cofactor context
Docked ligand
Overall assessment
Weak SASA cached
Weak or marginal quality
Binding strong Geometry medium Native strong SASA done
Strain ΔE
34.0 kcal/mol
Protein clashes
1
Internal clashes
1
Native overlap
contact recall 0.67, Jaccard 0.44
Burial
69%
Hydrophobic fit
88%
Reason: no major geometry red flags detected
1 protein-contact clashes
EcoTox / ADMET In-silico prediction only
Fish LC₅₀
Cat. 1 — Very toxic (≤1 mg/L)
Daphnia EC₅₀
Cat. 1 — Very toxic (≤1 mg/L)
Algae IC₅₀
Cat. 1 — Very toxic (≤1 mg/L)
Bioaccum.
Not B (BCF≤2000)
Persistent
No
ADMET alerts (in-silico)
hERG Medium Ames Clear DILI Risk
Molecular report
Full metrics ↗
Weak Marginal quality. Consider only alongside better-scoring alternatives.
✓ Excellent LE (-0.899 kcal/mol/HA) ✓ Good fit quality (FQ -8.93) ✓ Deep burial (69% SASA buried) ✓ Lipophilic contacts well-matched (88%) ✗ Very high strain energy (34.0 kcal/mol) ✗ Geometry warnings ✗ Many internal clashes (14)
Score
-29.684
kcal/mol
LE
-0.899
kcal/mol/HA
Fit Quality
-8.93
FQ (Leeson)
HAC
33
heavy atoms
MW
437
Da
LogP
4.85
cLogP
Final rank
3.1752
rank score
Inter norm
-0.727
normalised
Contacts
14
H-bonds 4
Strain ΔE
34.0 kcal/mol
SASA buried
69%
Lipo contact
88% BSA apolar/total
SASA unbound
709 Ų
Apolar buried
432 Ų

Interaction summary

HBD 2 HY 10 PI 1 CLASH 1

HBD/HBA · H-bonds (geometric)

HBD = ligand donates H · HBA = ligand accepts H · ~ = weak (≥110°). Mode: permissive. Residues: 2.

PI · π–π interactions

Native π–π recall is disabled because no explicit native π–π reference was stored.

HY · Hydrophobic contacts

CLASH · Clashes

Native ligand reference

★ reference
Interaction fingerprint calculated directly from the uploaded native ligand without docking. Current H-bond mode: permissive.
Name6RB5Contacts12
PoseOpen native poseHB0
IFP residues
ALA90 ARG74 GLY85 LEU73 LYS89 MET70 PHE83 PRO212 PRO213 SER86 SER87 VAL88
Current overlap8Native recall0.67
Jaccard0.44RMSD-
HB strict0Strict recall-
HB same residue+role0HB role recall-
HB same residue0HB residue recall-

Protein summary

493 residues
Protein targetT16Atoms7551
Residues493Chains1
Residue summaryVAL:768; LYS:704; LEU:703; ILE:532; GLU:450; THR:434; ARG:408; PHE:400; ALA:390; ASN:350; PRO:350; GLY:336; SER:319; TYR:294; ASP:276; MET:221

Receptor context

1 kept / 0 excluded
Receptor context filtering: interactions and SASA are computed against protein atoms plus allowed cofactors/ions. Native ligand-like HETATM partners are excluded from scoring.
Kept context 1 Excluded HETATM 0
Kept cofactors / ions
A:FAD501

All stored poses for this docking hit

PoseFinal rankInter normScoreHBCTCT overlapCT recallHB role rec.RMSDExcluded
322 3.1752481600344207 -0.726731 -29.684 4 14 8 0.67 - - no Current

Molecular metrics

RDKit SASA burial, strain energy (MMFF94s), ligand efficiency and fit quality for this docking pose.
✓ Metrics available

Scoring & efficiency

Docking score -29.684kcal/mol
Ligand efficiency (LE) -0.8995kcal/mol/HA
Score / heavy atom count
Fit quality (FQ) -8.925
LE / (0.072 + 0.95/HAC) — Leeson & Springthorpe
Heavy atom count 33HA

Physicochemical properties

Molecular weight 436.5Da
Lipinski: ≤ 500 Da
LogP (cLogP) 4.85
Lipinski: ≤ 5
Rotatable bonds 6

Conformational strain (MMFF94s)

Strain energy (ΔE) 34.05kcal/mol
< 5 good · 5–10 marginal · > 10 problematic
Docked FF energy 143.88kcal/mol
Minimised FF energy 109.83kcal/mol

SASA & burial

✓ computed
SASA (unbound) 708.6Ų
Total solvent-accessible surface area of free ligand
BSA total 490.0Ų
Buried surface area upon binding
BSA apolar 432.5Ų
Hydrophobic contacts buried
BSA polar 57.5Ų
Polar contacts buried
Fraction buried 69.1%
> 60 % indicates good pocket engagement
Lipophilic contact ratio 88.3%
BSA apolar / BSA total — high = hydrophobic driver
Δ Non-polar SASA -3231.9Ų
SASA_nonpolar(complex) − SASA_nonpolar(receptor) − SASA_nonpolar(ligand free). Negative = non-polar surface buried upon binding. Requires full polarity-decomposed SASA computation.
Receptor non-polar SASA 4076.6Ų
Non-polar SASA of receptor alone (VdW proxy, nonpolar atoms only)
Complex non-polar SASA 1490.0Ų
Non-polar SASA of full complex (VdW proxy, nonpolar atoms only)