FAIRMol

OHD_Leishmania_496

Pose ID 10186 Compound 4671 Pose 21

DB fairmolDocking pose analysis is being read from this database.
Molecular metrics status: done
RDKit SASA-based burial metrics are cached.
SASA cached
T16
T. brucei TR (Dimer interface (site 2)) T. brucei Dimer interface (site 2)
Ligand OHD_Leishmania_496
PDB6RB5

3D complex viewer

Strict H-bonds Permissive H-bonds
Viewer legend
Protein receptor
Pocket residues
Cofactor context
Docked ligand
Overall assessment
Weak SASA cached
Weak or marginal quality
Binding strong Geometry medium Native strong SASA done
Strain ΔE
11.3 kcal/mol
Protein clashes
3
Internal clashes
3
Native overlap
contact recall 0.75, Jaccard 0.50
Burial
74%
Hydrophobic fit
83%
Reason: no major geometry red flags detected
3 protein-contact clashes 3 intramolecular clashes
EcoTox / ADMET In-silico prediction only
Fish LC₅₀
Cat. 2 — Toxic (1–10 mg/L)
Daphnia EC₅₀
Cat. 2 — Toxic (1–10 mg/L)
Algae IC₅₀
Cat. 2 — Toxic (1–10 mg/L)
Bioaccum.
Not B (BCF≤2000)
Persistent
No
ADMET alerts (in-silico)
hERG Medium Ames Clear DILI Risk
Molecular report
Full metrics ↗
Weak Marginal quality. Consider only alongside better-scoring alternatives.
✓ Excellent LE (-0.737 kcal/mol/HA) ✓ Good fit quality (FQ -7.25) ✓ Good H-bonds (4 bonds) ✓ Deep burial (74% SASA buried) ✓ Lipophilic contacts well-matched (83%) ✗ Moderate strain (11.3 kcal/mol) ✗ Geometry warnings ✗ Many internal clashes (15)
Score
-23.583
kcal/mol
LE
-0.737
kcal/mol/HA
Fit Quality
-7.25
FQ (Leeson)
HAC
32
heavy atoms
MW
419
Da
LogP
4.38
cLogP
Final rank
4.0781
rank score
Inter norm
-0.710
normalised
Contacts
15
H-bonds 4
Strain ΔE
11.3 kcal/mol
SASA buried
74%
Lipo contact
83% BSA apolar/total
SASA unbound
686 Ų
Apolar buried
419 Ų

Interaction summary

HBD 1 HBA 3 HY 7 PI 0 CLASH 3

HBD/HBA · H-bonds (geometric)

HBD = ligand donates H · HBA = ligand accepts H · ~ = weak (≥110°). Mode: strict. Residues: 4.

PI · π–π interactions

No pi · π–π interactions detected for this pose.

HY · Hydrophobic contacts

CLASH · Clashes

Native ligand reference

★ reference
Interaction fingerprint calculated directly from the uploaded native ligand without docking. Current H-bond mode: strict.
Name6RB5Contacts12
PoseOpen native poseHB0
IFP residues
ALA90 ARG74 GLY85 LEU73 LYS89 MET70 PHE83 PRO212 PRO213 SER86 SER87 VAL88
Current overlap9Native recall0.75
Jaccard0.50RMSD-
HB strict0Strict recall-
HB same residue+role0HB role recall-
HB same residue0HB residue recall-

Protein summary

493 residues
Protein targetT16Atoms7551
Residues493Chains1
Residue summaryVAL:768; LYS:704; LEU:703; ILE:532; GLU:450; THR:434; ARG:408; PHE:400; ALA:390; ASN:350; PRO:350; GLY:336; SER:319; TYR:294; ASP:276; MET:221

Receptor context

1 kept / 0 excluded
Receptor context filtering: interactions and SASA are computed against protein atoms plus allowed cofactors/ions. Native ligand-like HETATM partners are excluded from scoring.
Kept context 1 Excluded HETATM 0
Kept cofactors / ions
A:FAD501

All stored poses for this docking hit

PoseFinal rankInter normScoreHBCTCT overlapCT recallHB role rec.RMSDExcluded
21 4.078083228577426 -0.70965 -23.5827 4 15 9 0.75 - - no Current

Molecular metrics

RDKit SASA burial, strain energy (MMFF94s), ligand efficiency and fit quality for this docking pose.
✓ Metrics available

Scoring & efficiency

Docking score -23.583kcal/mol
Ligand efficiency (LE) -0.7370kcal/mol/HA
Score / heavy atom count
Fit quality (FQ) -7.247
LE / (0.072 + 0.95/HAC) — Leeson & Springthorpe
Heavy atom count 32HA

Physicochemical properties

Molecular weight 419.5Da
Lipinski: ≤ 500 Da
LogP (cLogP) 4.38
Lipinski: ≤ 5
Rotatable bonds 3

Conformational strain (MMFF94s)

Strain energy (ΔE) 11.26kcal/mol
< 5 good · 5–10 marginal · > 10 problematic
Docked FF energy 88.54kcal/mol
Minimised FF energy 77.27kcal/mol

SASA & burial

✓ computed
SASA (unbound) 685.7Ų
Total solvent-accessible surface area of free ligand
BSA total 505.9Ų
Buried surface area upon binding
BSA apolar 419.5Ų
Hydrophobic contacts buried
BSA polar 86.4Ų
Polar contacts buried
Fraction buried 73.8%
> 60 % indicates good pocket engagement
Lipophilic contact ratio 82.9%
BSA apolar / BSA total — high = hydrophobic driver
Δ Non-polar SASA -3163.8Ų
SASA_nonpolar(complex) − SASA_nonpolar(receptor) − SASA_nonpolar(ligand free). Negative = non-polar surface buried upon binding. Requires full polarity-decomposed SASA computation.
Receptor non-polar SASA 4076.6Ų
Non-polar SASA of receptor alone (VdW proxy, nonpolar atoms only)
Complex non-polar SASA 1487.7Ų
Non-polar SASA of full complex (VdW proxy, nonpolar atoms only)